Isomorphism under differentiation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the differentiation of the function sin(x) can be considered a valid cyclic group. A group requires a binary operation involving its elements, which leads to questions about the elements and operations in this context. Differentiation is identified as a function that operates on functions rather than a binary operation between two real-valued functions. While differentiation can be viewed cyclically when considering sin(x) and its derivatives, it lacks a direct connection to group theory. However, a cyclic group could potentially be defined using a set of functions like (sin(x), cos(x), -sin(x), -cos(x)) with consecutive differentiation as the operation.
tomgotthefunk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is 《sinx》under differentiation a valid cyclic group.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A group must have a binary operation involving it's elements. What are the elements of the group you are asking about? What is the binary operation?

Perhaps you are thinking that differentiation operates on a set of real valued functions. That is true, but differentiation itself is not a real valued function. (Differentiation is a function from functions to other functions.) So differentiation of a function is not a binary operation involving two real valued functions.
 
  • Like
Likes tomgotthefunk
Consider sin as a row, then differentiation is cyclic, but there is not any connection with groups.
 
You could consider differentiation operations on the set (sinx, cosx, -sinx, -cosx) where the + operation is consecutive differentiation. With a little work, I am sure you could define a cyclic group.
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K