Isospin Doublet Derivation Using Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving isospin doublets using Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, specifically for the I = 1/2 doublet. The user has successfully derived the I = 3/2 quadruplet but encounters issues with the doublet representation. The correct states are given as |1/2,1/2> = (√2/3)uud - √(1/3)√(1/2)(ud + du)u and |1/2,-1/2> = (√2/3)√(1/2)(ud + du)d - (√2/3)ddu. The user realizes that utilizing Clebsch-Gordan coefficients directly is more effective than relying on ladder operators.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients
  • Familiarity with isospin quantum numbers
  • Knowledge of ladder operators in quantum mechanics
  • Basic proficiency in quantum state representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients in detail
  • Learn about isospin multiplets and their physical significance
  • Explore the application of ladder operators in quantum mechanics
  • Review examples of constructing quantum states using Clebsch-Gordan coefficients
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on particle physics and isospin symmetry, will benefit from this discussion.

nigelscott
Messages
133
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



I am trying to improve my understanding of the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. I am looking at page 5 of the following document https://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys570/fa2013/chapter3.pdf

Homework Equations


I have derived the result for the I = 3/2 quadruplet but am having a problem with deriving the following I = 1/2 doublet.

|1/2,1/2> = (√2/3)uud - √(1/3)√(1/2)(ud + du)u

and,

|1/2,-1/2> = (√2/3)√(1/2)(ud + du)d - (√2/3)ddu

The Attempt at a Solution


For starters I think the coefficient (√2/3) should be √(2/3) to get the RHS. I know these states can be obtained via orthogonality, but the paper suggest they can be found using the ladder operators and CG coefficients directly. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those have typos. Why don't you just look up the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients and construct the states for yourself?
 
OK. Thanks. I think my problem was that I was trying to use the ladder operators to get those states. . Using the C-G coefficients from tables makes more sense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
24K