Isothermal compressibility and spring constant solids

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between isothermal compressibility (κ) and the spring constant (k₀) in solids arranged in a cubic lattice. The derived equation from the forum is κ = a/(N k₀), which differs from the expected κ = a/k₀. Participants explore the assumptions made in the calculations, particularly regarding the treatment of the lattice and the effects of pressure on volume. The conversation emphasizes the need for a more rigorous approach to the problem, particularly in how volume changes are calculated under pressure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of isothermal compressibility (κ) and its formula.
  • Familiarity with spring constants and restoring forces in solid mechanics.
  • Knowledge of cubic lattice structures and atomic arrangements.
  • Basic principles of calculus as applied to physical systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of isothermal compressibility in solid-state physics.
  • Learn about the implications of lattice structures on mechanical properties.
  • Investigate the relationship between pressure, volume, and force in solids.
  • Explore advanced topics in solid mechanics, including non-linear elasticity.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in solid-state physics, materials science, and mechanical engineering who are analyzing the mechanical properties of solids and their response to external forces.

PhizKid
Messages
477
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Consider a solid of compressibility ##\kappa##. Assume that the atoms in this solid are arranged on a regular cubic lattice, the distance between their nearest neighbors being ##a##. Assume further that a restoring force ##-k_0 \Delta a## acts on a given atom when it is displaced by a distance ##\Delta a## from its nearest neighbor. Use simple reasoning to find an approximate relation between the spring constant ##k_0## and the compressibility ##\kappa## of this solid.

Homework Equations



##\kappa = \frac{1}{V}\frac{\partial V}{\partial p}|_{T}##.

The Attempt at a Solution



Consider a cubic lattice of ##N+1## atoms on each edge. Take ##N \gg 1## so that ##N+1 \approx N##. The area of any given face of the lattice is ##A = N^2 a^2##. Imagine now that the face is pushed inward by the amount ##\Delta a## where ##\frac{\Delta a}{a} \ll 1##. Then there is an increase in the total force exerted on this face due to the restoring force ##F = -k_0 \Delta a## on each of the ##(N+1)^2## atoms in this face; the increase in total force on this face will be given in magnitude by ##\Delta F = (N+1)^2 \Delta a k_0 \approx N^2 \Delta a k_0##.

Then ##\kappa = \frac{1}{V}\frac{\partial V}{\partial p}|_T = \frac{1}{N a}\frac{\partial a}{\partial p}|_T \approx \frac{1}{a}\frac{\Delta a}{\Delta p} = \frac{1}{a}\frac{N^2 a^2 \Delta a}{N^2 \Delta a k_0} = \frac{a}{N k_0}##.

According to the book the correct answer is ##\kappa = \frac{a}{k_0}## which is not what I got. However I am not sure of how to fix my solution. I could I suppose take a parallelipiped with sides of length ##Na## whose faces are to be pushed inwards, and sides of length ##a## which are parallel to the force applied to push the aforementioned faces inwards. However this looks to be a very contrived escape in fixing my solution on top of the assumptions I already made that make my solution above look quite non-rigorous. For example I took the solid to be a cubic lattice as opposed to any crystal lattice and I also took ##N \gg 1## to make ##(N+1)^2 \approx N^2##, neither of which are assumptions made in the problem statement. Could anyone help me in fixing my solution. Also, could any comment on whether or not I could make the calculation more rigorous? Any hints on how to do so? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
PhizKid said:
Then ##\kappa = \frac{1}{V}\frac{\partial V}{\partial p}|_T = \frac{1}{N a}\frac{\partial a}{\partial p}|_T ##

Can you explain how you get the second equality here?
 
TSny said:
Can you explain how you get the second equality here?

##\kappa = \frac{1}{V}\frac{\partial V}{\partial p} = \frac{1}{A L}\frac{A \Delta a}{\Delta p} = \frac{a N^2 \Delta a}{N (N^2 k_0 \Delta a)} = \frac{a}{k_0 N}##
 
PhizKid said:
##\kappa = \frac{1}{V}\frac{\partial V}{\partial p} = \frac{1}{A L}\frac{A \Delta a}{\Delta p} = \frac{a N^2 \Delta a}{N (N^2 k_0 \Delta a)} = \frac{a}{k_0 N}##

V = AL. When V changes, it appears you are assuming that only L changes and not A. Shouldn't A also change?

That is, how do you get ##\partial V = A \Delta a##?
 
TSny said:
V = AL. When V changes, it appears you are assuming that only L changes and not A. Shouldn't A also change?

That is, how do you get ##\partial V = A \Delta a##?

In the calculation I was simply pushing one face of the cube inwards by some small amount so the area of the face is the same since the push is normal to the face itself.
 
I believe the usual definition of compressibility ##\kappa## involves the change in volume when the pressure is increased over the entire surface. So, for a cube, you would consider the change in volume when the pressure is increased on all six faces.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K