Isothermic and adiabatic compression

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the ratio of work done during the isothermal and adiabatic compression of a single-atom ideal gas to one-tenth of its original volume, with equal initial pressure, volume, and gas amount in both cases.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationships between work done in isothermal and adiabatic processes, referencing relevant equations and principles such as the first law of thermodynamics and specific heat capacities.
  • Some participants question the definitions and roles of variables like "f" and "K" in their equations, while others seek clarification on the implications of work being done on or by the gas.
  • There are attempts to derive expressions for work in both cases and to compare them, with some participants expressing confusion over the simplification of ratios.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and guidance on the equations and concepts involved. There is an exploration of different interpretations regarding the work done in the context of the first law of thermodynamics, and multiple approaches to the problem are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, including the requirement to compare work done in two different thermodynamic processes and the implications of adiabatic conditions where heat transfer is zero.

mk9898
Messages
109
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


Determine the ratio of the work that you must expend when a single-atom ideal Gas once isothermic and once adiabatic to 1/10 of its original volume is compressed. In both cases the initial pressure, initial volume and gas amount are all equal.

The Attempt at a Solution


Case 1: Isotherm --> ##\triangle Q = W##
(saving derivation) ##Q = RTln(10)##

Case 2: Adiabatic: --> ##\frac{fNk\triangle T}{2T}= \frac{-NkdV}{V}##

##\frac{f}{2}lnT + ln(10) = constant##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mk9898 said:

Homework Statement


Determine the ratio of the work that you must expend when a single-atom ideal Gas once isothermic and once adiabatic to 1/10 of its original volume is compressed. In both cases the initial pressure, initial volume and gas amount are all equal.

The Attempt at a Solution


Case 1: Isotherm --> ##\triangle Q = W##
(saving derivation) ##Q = RTln(10)##
Ok.

Case 2: Adiabatic: --> ##\frac{fNk\triangle T}{2T}= \frac{-NkdV}{V}##

##\frac{f}{2}lnT + ln(10) = constant##
You will have to explain your thinking there. What is "f"? What is the formula you are using for adiabatic work? Start with:
W = \int_{V_0}^{V_f} PdV
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mk9898
Case 1. Isothermal compression, pV = con, Wk = ∫ p dV, Case 2. Adiabatic compression, p(V)^γ = con, γ = c(p)/c(V), Wk = ∫ p dV
 
Thanks for the replies.

Case 2: ##W=-\triangle U##
##\triangle U =nC_v(T_2-T_1) ## ##(C_v## is with the mole of the gas)
Therefore ##W = nC_v(T_1-T_2)##>0

Now I'm scratching my head at the next step... If I solve the integral for W then I get what I got from case 1 which I believe doesn't help me... any thoughts?
 
In case 1. Wk = ∫ p dV = ∫ con1. (dV / V); in case 2. Wk = ∫ p dV = ∫ con2. (dV / V^γ)
 
mk9898 said:
Thanks for the replies.

Case 2: ##W=-\triangle U##
##\triangle U =nC_v(T_2-T_1) ## ##(C_v## is with the mole of the gas)
Therefore ##W = nC_v(T_1-T_2)##>0

Now I'm scratching my head at the next step... If I solve the integral for W then I get what I got from case 1 which I believe doesn't help me... any thoughts?
For the adiabatic part, you can use the formula for adiabatic work (see, for example, this hyperphysics page )

or you can do this: Using the first law, Q = ΔU + W = CvΔT + W, so W = Q - CvΔT. Use the adiabatic condition to find the change in temperature (hint: in PVγ=K, substitute RT/V for P to get: TV(γ-1) = constant).

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mk9898
Ok so I have ##W = \frac{K((\frac{V}{10})^{1-\gamma}-(V)^{1-\gamma})}{1-\gamma}##. The exercise wants us to determine the ratio i.e. compare the two values. Maybe I'm not seeing something but such a comparison doesn't lead to any easy cancellation of determines between ##RTln(10)## and ##\frac{K((\frac{V}{10})^{1-\gamma}-(V)^{1-\gamma})}{1-\gamma}##.
 
What is K? Once you insert K into the W equation you should see how to simplify the ratio.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mk9898
Ah ok then I have: ##\frac{\frac{RT9/10}{1-\gamma}}{RTln(10)}## which is ##\frac{0.9}{ln10(1-\gamma)}## and then I can solve for gamma (gamma is 1+f/2 = 5/2). Is my logic right there?
 
  • #10
mk9898 said:
Ok so I have ##W = \frac{K((\frac{V}{10})^{1-\gamma}-(V)^{1-\gamma})}{1-\gamma}##. The exercise wants us to determine the ratio i.e. compare the two values. Maybe I'm not seeing something but such a comparison doesn't lead to any easy cancellation of determines between ##RTln(10)## and ##\frac{K((\frac{V}{10})^{1-\gamma}-(V)^{1-\gamma})}{1-\gamma}##.
For the adiabatic case: ##T_f/T_i = (V_i/V_f)^{γ-1}##. From that find ΔT and just plug that into the first law W = Q-ΔU to find W. (hint: ΔU = CvΔT . What is Q? Cv?)
Compare that to RTiln(10).

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mk9898
  • #11
Thanks for the post. Q = 0 since it's an adiabatic process i.e. no change in heat in the system. ##\triangle T = T_f - T_i >0## since it is an adiabatic compression. Or did you mean something else with finding ##\triangle T##?
 
  • #12
mk9898 said:
Thanks for the post. Q = 0 since it's an adiabatic process i.e. no change in heat in the system. ##\triangle T = T_f - T_i >0## since it is an adiabatic compression. Or did you mean something else with finding ##\triangle T##?
So work it out: ##\Delta T = T_i(\left(\frac{V_i}{V_f}\right)^{\gamma-1} -1) = ??##

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mk9898
  • #13
And then is ##W = C_vT_i(1-\left(\frac{V_i}{V_f}\right)^{\gamma-1}) ##
 
  • #14
mk9898 said:
And then is ##W = C_vT_i(1-\left(\frac{V_i}{V_f}\right)^{\gamma-1}) ##
Correct. In the statement of the first law that I used, Q = ΔU + W, W is the work done BY the gas. So W is negative.

All you have to do is express Cv in terms of R and then divide by the isothermal work.

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mk9898
  • #15
##W = C_vT_i(1-\left(\frac{V_i}{V_f}\right)^{\gamma-1}) = \frac{f}{2}RT_i(1-\left(\frac{V_i}{V_f}\right)^{\gamma-1}) = \frac{f}{2}RT_i(1-10^{\gamma-1})##
Isotherm should not be "T" above but ##RT_iln(10)##
Then I take a look at the ratio.
Thanks a lot for the patience Andrew and for the help!
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Andrew Mason said:
Correct. In the statement of the first law that I used, Q = ΔU + W, W is the work done BY the gas. So W is negative.

Shouldn't that be, that work is being done TO the gas? If the work was being done by the gas, then it would be positive since the gas would be doing the work and hence pushing the volume outward? Or is this just based on perspective?
 
  • #17
mk9898 said:
Shouldn't that be, that work is being done TO the gas? If the work was being done by the gas, then it would be positive since the gas would be doing the work and hence pushing the volume outward? Or is this just based on perspective?
W is the work done BY the gas. Another way to write the first law is: ΔU = Q-W. This says that the change in internal energy of the system is equal to the heat flow (into) the system minus the work done BY the system. In an isothermal process with an ideal gas, ΔU = 0. So the work done BY the system is equal to the heat flow into the system.

AM
 
  • #18
Another thought is for an isothermal process, as you take work out you must add an equal amount of heat energy to keep T constant and conversely as you put work in say in compressing the gas you need to transfer heat energy out to keep T constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K