It doesn't make sense to get negative

  • Thread starter Thread starter davedave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative
AI Thread Summary
Car A travels at 72.2 km/h and is currently 48 km behind car B, which travels at 53 km/h. The initial approach to solving the problem involved setting equations for the time taken by each car to reach their respective positions, but this led to an incorrect negative time result. A more effective method is to establish a coordinate system where car A's position is set to zero and express their positions as functions of time. By calculating the relative speed difference and using it to determine how long it takes for car A to close the 48 km gap, the problem can be accurately solved. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly defining the starting positions and using relative speeds for such problems.
davedave
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
The speed of car A is 72.2 km/h while the speed of car B is 53 km/h. If car B is now 48 km ahead of car A, how much time is needed for car A to catch up with car B?


car A
let x = the current position of car A
speed = 72.2 km/h
time = x/72.2 hours

car B
let x + 48 = the current position of car B
speed = 53 km/h
time = (x + 48)/53 hours

so, both cars will have traveled for the same amount of time when car A catches up with car B.

then, x/72.2 = (x + 48)/53

solving for x gives x = -180.5 km
thus, time of car A is -2.5 hours.

You cannot have negative time.

Could someone explain my solution? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does "time of car A" mean, and what does it have to do with the problem?
 
Perhaps start with a picture of the problem and take the intial position of A to be at the origin to simplify things a little. Then write the position as a function of time for both cars. If you do this and be careful with signs, that should correct your error.
 
Davedave, instead of expressing the "times", write:


A\left ( t \right ) = ... (position of car A at time t)
B\left ( t \right ) = ... (position of car B at time t)

And express what "to catch up" means in terms of these functions.
 
davedave said:
The speed of car A is 72.2 km/h while the speed of car B is 53 km/h. If car B is now 48 km ahead of car A, how much time is needed for car A to catch up with car B?car A
let x = the current position of car A
There is no point in including this at all. Set up your "coordinate system" so that when t= 0, x= 0.

speed = 72.2 km/h
time = x/72.2 hours
This is time to go "x" km but doesn't tell you anything. "x" is not relevant to the problem.

car B
let x + 48 = the current position of car B
Since we are taking x= 0, this is just 48 km ahead of A.

speed = 53 km/h
time = (x + 48)/53 hours
Again, this is just the time B would have taken to get to its current position and is irrelevant.

so, both cars will have traveled for the same amount of time when car A catches up with car B.

then, x/72.2 = (x + 48)/53
No, these are the times until they reach their current positions (with A 48 km behind B) and you don't know that they are the same because you don't know where they started.

Instead do this in either of two ways:
1) Taking A's current position as our x= 0 point in t hours A will have gone 72.2t km and be at position x= 72.2t. In that same t hours, B will have gone 53t km and will be at x= 53t+ 48. Set those equal and solve for t.

2) Since speed is "relative", do everything "relative to B", treating B as if it were standing still. A is "closing on B" at a relative speed of 72.2- 53= 19.2 km per hour. How long will it take A to cover the 48 km between it and B?

solving for x gives x = -180.5 km
thus, time of car A is -2.5 hours.

You cannot have negative time.

Could someone explain my solution? Thanks.
No, because your "solution" is based on faulty reasoning.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top