Iterative methods: system of linear equations

Click For Summary
An effective technique for solving systems of linear equations that guarantees convergence is sought, particularly one that outperforms ordinary Gauss elimination and Cramer's Rule for large matrices. While Gauss elimination is widely used due to its reliable convergence, it may not be the most efficient for all cases. Advanced methods like LU-factorization can offer speed but often sacrifice absolute convergence, leading to conditional results. For specific types of matrices, such as symmetric positive-definite systems, the conjugate-gradient method is recommended. Ultimately, achieving both efficiency and guaranteed convergence in iterative methods presents inherent challenges.
defunc
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm looking for a an effective technique for solving a system of linear equations. It should always converge, unlike jacobi or gauss seidel etc. It has to be more efficient than ordinary gauss elimination or kramers rule for large matrices.

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First off, anything is more efficient than Cramer's Rule!

Secondly, why do you think Gauss elimination is focused so much upon?
It is precisely because it IS the major technique tat always produces convergence.

You may look up into LU-factorization schemes and so on, but typically, these faster (and often preferred) methods will only have conditional convergence.

Simply put, calculation speed is gained by dropping mathematical safe-guards that ensure absolute convergence.

Thus, what you are seeking after is, really, a contradiction in terms.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K