- #1
IUPAC Naming: Troubleshooting Mistakes
- Thread starter Manh
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Iupac Troubleshooting
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the IUPAC naming of a specific organic compound, focusing on identifying the correct substituents and their positions. It is a homework-related inquiry involving the application of IUPAC nomenclature rules.
Discussion Character
- Homework-related
Main Points Raised
- One participant presents a proposed IUPAC name, "3-ethyl, 6-isopropyl nonane," but expresses uncertainty about the correctness of the positions assigned to the substituents.
- Another participant suggests that the numbering of the carbon atoms may have been done incorrectly, indicating that 3 and 6 are smaller than 4 and 7.
- A clarification is made regarding the substituent names, with one participant correcting "3-ethyl" to "3-methyl."
- There is a reiteration of the proposed name by a participant, indicating a potential confusion in counting the carbon atoms in the structure.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the correct naming and numbering of the substituents, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.
Contextual Notes
The discussion lacks clarity on the structural representation of the compound, which may affect the interpretation of the IUPAC name. There are also unresolved aspects regarding the counting of carbon atoms and the correct identification of substituents.
- #2
Dr Transport
Science Advisor
- 2,603
- 785
I think it is 3-ethyl, 6-isopropyl nonane
3 & 6 are smaller than 4 & 7
3 & 6 are smaller than 4 & 7
- #3
Bystander
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
- 5,621
- 1,773
"3-methyl" you mean?Dr Transport said:
- #4
Dr Transport
Science Advisor
- 2,603
- 785
yes... methyl as opposed to ethyl...
- #5
Similar threads
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 6 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 3 ·