Iupac Nomenclature

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on IUPAC nomenclature, specifically analyzing the compounds 1-Bromo-2-(bromomethyl)butane and 2-Ethyl-1,3-propanediol. The key conclusion is that the base chain selection is influenced by the priority of functional groups; -OH has a higher priority than -Br, leading to different base chains for structurally similar compounds. The participants confirmed that the nomenclature aligns with ChemSketch naming conventions and referenced a functional group priority table for further validation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of IUPAC nomenclature rules
  • Familiarity with functional group prioritization
  • Knowledge of organic compound structures
  • Experience with chemical drawing software like ChemSketch
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the IUPAC rules for naming organic compounds
  • Learn about functional group priority in organic chemistry
  • Explore the use of ChemSketch for molecular visualization
  • Review examples of nomenclature for complex organic molecules
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and anyone involved in chemical nomenclature or molecular structure analysis will benefit from this discussion.

neilparker62
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,200
Reaction score
708
TL;DR
Application of rules for determining the longest carbon chain
Consider the compounds

1-Bromo-2-(bromomethyl)butane​

1737271362747.png


and

2-Ethyl-1,3-propanediol​

1737271510114.png

1737275049359.png


As can be seen they are structurally similar compounds. The first has bromine substituents and the second has hydroxyl substituents.

My question is why does one have a butane base chain whilst the other has a propane base chain ?
 

Attachments

  • 1737275027304.png
    1737275027304.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 54
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I am not entirely sure, but my understanding is that it is not strictly about the longest chain, even if in most cases that's how it works. First you need to prioritize the functional groups present and then select the longest continuous carbon chain to give the highest ranking group the lowest possible number. -OH is high, -Br is quite low on the list, even behind the carbon itself, so probably in the first case Br is ignored, and in the second diol is chosen as the backbone of the molecule.

Just checked that these names are consistent with what ChemSketch names these molecules.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: neilparker62
Borek said:
I am not entirely sure, but my understanding is that it is not strictly about the longest chain, even if in most cases that's how it works. First you need to prioritize the functional groups present and then select the longest continuous carbon chain to give the highest ranking group the lowest possible number. -OH is high, -Br is quite low on the list, even behind the carbon itself, so probably in the first case Br is ignored, and in the second diol is chosen as the backbone of the molecule.

Just checked that these names are consistent with what ChemSketch names these molecules.
Many thanks - looked up "priority of functional groups in iupac nomenclature" and found following ref which bears out what you say:

https://www.masterorganicchemistry....functional-group-priorities-for-nomenclature/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K