Ivan's Creek: Low-head hydro-electric power

  • Thread starter Thread starter Integral
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for a hydroelectric power installation at Ivan's Creek, exploring the feasibility, environmental considerations, and technical aspects of such a project. Participants share personal experiences related to the creek and discuss various implications of building a dam and generating power.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest the idea of installing a hydroelectric plant upstream, considering the creek's flow rates and potential power output.
  • One participant outlines estimated costs for dam construction, turbine installation, and expected power production, while expressing skepticism about the project's overall feasibility.
  • Concerns are raised about the environmental impact of dam installation, including the creation of a lake and the need for studies and permits.
  • Another participant mentions the possibility of using a Banki crossflow turbine, noting its advantages in design and construction.
  • Some participants discuss the regulatory landscape, mentioning that low-head hydro systems may face fewer regulations compared to larger projects.
  • There is a recognition of the uncertainty involved in maintaining the creek bed and ensuring adequate head for turbine efficiency.
  • Personal anecdotes about the creek's condition and past flooding events are shared, highlighting the dynamic nature of the environment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of enthusiasm and skepticism regarding the hydroelectric project. While some are supportive of exploring the idea, others raise concerns about environmental regulations and practical challenges, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the creek's seasonal flow and the absence of certain fish populations, which may influence regulatory requirements. There is also mention of the need for collaboration with neighboring property owners, which adds complexity to the feasibility of the project.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in small-scale renewable energy projects, environmental impact assessments, and hydroelectric power generation may find this discussion relevant.

Integral
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
7,232
Reaction score
66
Got a call from Ivan yesterday, seems the creek was flowing full. Here are some pics.

Here is the foot bridge he as spoken (writen?) of:
http://home.comcast.net/~integral50/scenery/bridge.JPG

Last summer the deer were bedding down under this tree:
http://home.comcast.net/~integral50/scenery/deer.JPG

Another shot of the creek:

http://home.comcast.net/~integral50/scenery/creek.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ivan, have you thought of a hydroelectric plant up stream? :biggrin:
 
Astronuc said:
Ivan, have you thought of a hydroelectric plant up stream? :biggrin:
Avg min flows [8 months] : 30 CFS
Max flow : 300 CFS
Max Head possible : 5 Ft
Expected avg power production: 5KW
Dam :$3500
Gen and electrical :$2500
Turbine :Banki Crossflow < $1000
Pay back <3 Years?
Nope, never thought about it. :biggrin:
For perspective, that bridge is 4.5 feet above the creek bed, it has about a 20 foot span, and the water is moving at about eight to ten feet per second [surface, center of stream]. When we bought this place we thought that it was just a nice little creek.

If I ever do it I plan to use the power for heat with a variable load to ensure max eff of the turbine. The remaining heating coils could run off of line power as needed. Any excess power would be directed to a pre-heater tank installed ahead of the regular water heater. This way I can avoid all of the complications of having to produce clean, 60 Hz power. I could even go DC.
 
Last edited:
Integral didn't want to cross the bridge. :confused:
 
Geeze, you guys have been getting a lot of rain lately, haven't you?
 
I had to drive through two 'lakes' on the road on the way to work yesterday. :biggrin:
 
Dang. That's ^ MY post.

i sure wish ivan would remember to log off my computer when he's done... [/size]:rolleyes:
 
Tsu said:
Dang. That's ^ MY post.
i sure wish ivan would remember to log off my computer when he's done... [/size]:rolleyes:
You know you could destroy his reputation, right? :biggrin:
 
Oh, yes. :devil: It's my ace in the hole. How do you think I get my way as much as I do? :biggrin: And that's not even taking into account what I could do to him in the MENTORS forum! :devil: :smile: :smile:
 
  • #10
Why that's a beautiful creek! I guess even creeks want to be a river, every now and then.
 
  • #11
...

...

....

i thought this was a pitch for a new pf show about a teenage ivan and his exploits in a small town with all his hot friends who all sleep with each other at some point.
 
  • #12
Gale said:
...
...
....
i thought this was a pitch for a new pf show about a teenage ivan and his exploits in a small town with all his hot friends who all sleep with each other at some point.
LOL :smile: That's the first thing I thought, too. That stupid theme song is stuck in my head now!
 
  • #13
Wouldn't the installation of a dam end up producing a (potentially very large) lake behind it? Wouldn't this need considerable environmental study and collaboration with downstream residents and so on? I'm actually curious about the feasability.

- Warren
 
  • #14
chroot said:
Wouldn't the installation of a dam end up producing a (potentially very large) lake behind it? Wouldn't this need considerable environmental study and collaboration with downstream residents and so on? I'm actually curious about the feasability.

- Warren

If the dam were located near the foot bridge, the maximum head might be obtained by doing some dozing work down stream. At that point I have enough storage up-stream to accommodate the water level without backing up water on the adjacent property.

Since it is a seasonal creek and is known not to contain anadromous fish populations, and since I have water rights as it crosses the property, in principle I can do this with almost no regulation. I would need a good number of permits to start but most of those are really just a formality. However, a couple could be sticky, esp mainly when it comes to approval from the neighbors. The next property on either side [up-stream and down-stream] would have to agree to the installation.

Oregon really was encouraging low-head hydro for a while, and part of the economic feasibility was based on the 30% tax credit that was once available. This is not available any longer but I believe that there are still federal tax credits available.

Even though oxygenation of the water is problem with any turbine, apparently low-head systems escape most environmental regulation; presumably since the benefits are believed to outweigh the costs. Note also that by design, the electrical would be isolated from the grid, thus reducing the number of regulations and avoiding the famous $10K safety switch.

Of course the real key here in the backwoods is that you do what you want as long as you don't bother anyone. To tell you the truth, the county officials would probably have a heart attack if I walked in the office with the engineering plans. But for me the other key point is that my experience in the real world tells me that there are too many variables involved here to be certain of how it would work out, and I have never done this because in spite of the numbers, my gut tells me that I won't come out ahead on this one. I keep waiting for a change of heart.

Edit: If we had a five foot water fall I wouldn't hesitate [except perhaps due to cosmetics], but I suspect that maintenance of the creek bed would kill it. I need four feet of effective head or the whole thing falls apart. At that point the turbine's eff curve drops like a rock as it starts to function improperly, and getting those four feet is not only the hardest part of the job, the maintenance requirements afterwards are some of the greatest unknowns. It can be a very dynamic creek; as you can see.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Math Is Hard said:
LOL :smile: That's the first thing I thought, too. That stupid theme song is stuck in my head now!

YAY for MIH! i always feel silly when i go to a thread for the entirely wrong reason. but soon as i first saw the thread title, i went and downloaded the song...

"i don't want to wait for our lives to be over!
i want to know right now what will it be.
i don't want to wait for our lives to be over!
oh will it be, yes oh will it be... something... "

gosh that dawson was a cute guy..
 
  • #16
Btw, the really nice things about the Banki turbine are that it is easy to design and build, it can be made with inexpensive pipe and steel, and the flow is mainly laminar, so the oxygenation should be kept to a minimum.
 
  • #17
http://home.comcast.net/~integral50/scenery/streamlr.JPG

The state of the stream today... Not nearly as exciting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
Wow, what a difference from yesterday! It looks all sweet and innocent today.
 
  • #19
I wish I could get invited to visit a nice place like that
 
  • #20
Here is a pic of the '96 flood - a 500 year flood! You can see the foot bridge just to the right. We had tree stumps that weighed at least 500 pounds, out in the pasture afterwards. Edit: All of the water that you see actually entered our property as a confined flow in the creek bed, then over-flowed and spread out from there. It was a sight to behold. S.W.A.G.: 2000 CFS

Then a similar shot to Integral's, in the snow.

The creek is really cool and it has entertained the hydraulic engineer in me for many hours. Having a place like this is no small challenge, especially for a Los Angeles city-boy like me, and there are many negatives as well as positives, but the creek is a big plus for sure. We do love it.


http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/3487/floodsandsnow3fi.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
I have a creek down in Florida (or used to), it was very nice to sit on the deck and watch the water. But you know what, that winter picture of the creek blows mine away. Its so beautiful. :)
 
  • #22
Ivan Seeking said:
Btw, the really nice things about the Banki turbine are that it is easy to design and build, it can be made with inexpensive pipe and steel, and the flow is mainly laminar, so the oxygenation should be kept to a minimum.
I did a little googling on this, and it does look easy to make. Do you know how to weld? That's one thing I never managed to pick up that you would probably need to make this kind of turbine.
 
  • #23
zoobyshoe said:
I did a little googling on this, and it does look easy to make. Do you know how to weld? That's one thing I never managed to pick up that you would probably need to make this kind of turbine.

Since it wouldn't matter if it was a big ugly mess, I could weld it. :biggrin: I was pretty good on arc and acetylene welding at age 18, but now it would take some practice.

Due to the fact that they are a double impulse turbine, the Banki turbines can be surprisingly efficient. I found an old Master's thesis at OSU that goes through the entire design process, and their unit tested as I think almost 70% efficient.
 
  • #24
I remember you talking about some guy who was building a paddlewheel to power his home and you didn't have the heart to tell him he just flushed his bank account into the stream.
Do you know this stuff because:
a. it's part of your job
b. you have a stream in your backyard so did research
c. you know everything
 
  • #25
I took a minor in hydraulic engineering and then continued to study this because of the interest in generating power.

I know nothing, but at least I know that I know nothing, and that's something. :biggrin:
 
  • #26
false modesty makes me sick
 
  • #27
tribdog said:
false modesty makes me sick

Obviously not a Socrates fan...
 
  • #28
You know I'm only a fan of you.
 
  • #29
How much money did you want?
 
  • #30
Ivan Seeking said:
Since it wouldn't matter if it was a big ugly mess, I could weld it. :biggrin: I was pretty good on arc and acetylene welding at age 18, but now it would take some practice.
Due to the fact that they are a double impulse turbine, the Banki turbines can be surprisingly efficient. I found an old Master's thesis at OSU that goes through the entire design process, and their unit tested as I think almost 70% efficient.
Here's a guy who made a small one out of junk, and also made his own generator to go with it:

http://www.otherpower.com/scotthydro1.html

Sounds like he gets a lot of power out of the little thing.
 

Similar threads

Concept subsea PHES system, /advice with calculations
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Graduate Is in-stream, low-flow, micro-hydro production of great power a fantasy?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K