I've always wondered about this, not sure if a Science forum can help

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forum Science
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the requirement for science students to take humanities courses in college. Participants explore the rationale behind this educational structure, its implications on students' GPAs, and the perceived value of such courses in relation to a science-focused curriculum.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the necessity of humanities courses for science majors, suggesting that high school education should suffice.
  • Others argue that humanities courses contribute to a well-rounded education, promoting critical thinking and communication skills.
  • There are claims that the GPA calculation treats all courses equally, regardless of discipline, which raises concerns about the impact of humanities courses on science students' academic performance.
  • A participant suggests that interdisciplinary courses could be more beneficial, proposing tailored humanities courses relevant to science majors, such as "History of Engineering."
  • Some express that the humanities requirement may not be as stringent in other countries, particularly in the UK, where students often focus solely on their chosen discipline.
  • Several participants share personal experiences regarding the balance of humanities and science courses, highlighting both positive and negative aspects of their educational journeys.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on the value and necessity of humanities courses for science students. Multiple competing views remain regarding the benefits and drawbacks of such requirements.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the effectiveness of humanities courses in enhancing the education of science students, while others highlight the potential for tailored courses that could bridge the gap between disciplines.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a major in science, educators involved in curriculum design, and individuals interested in the intersection of humanities and STEM fields may find this discussion relevant.

  • #31
jmason52 said:
If you can't understand why a project has developed the way it has (history) or how to describe a double helix (art) or be able to write a simple papern (English) that's readable to those who might or might not give you funding on it's basis, then you can never consider yourself educated. To truly explore the universe, you really should be acquainted with all of it's facets.
Well-rounded would be a good way to describe this. Back in the 18th C in America, it was expected that children from well-off families should read Latin and Greek, and be able to access historical texts in those languages. It was also expected that the children show proficiency in mathematics and sciences. Until the "socialist" practice of publicly-financed public education gained a foothold, this type of education was reserved for the wealthy, who could hire private instructors, or could band together and hire an instructor and support a school that more children could attend. This type of education was inaccessible to the poor, and often to females.

There were "dame schools" that helped fill some gaps, but often children were seen as "help" in the family enterprises, and were not willingly allowed to better themselves if their families were struggling. We live in better times, in this regard, IMO.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ryker said:
While, at least in my opinion, "History of Airplane Engineering" would be useless...

It depends how it was taught. If it was just a catalogue of the USA's (or Russia's, or China's) achievements that were supposedly infinitely superior to the rest of the world's feeble efforts, then of course it would be useless.

On the other hand, if it explored topics like

* Changing attitudes to risk (and litigation)
* Reactions by the industry, the media, politicians, etc to serious unforseen problems
* The historical role (proactive or reactive) of independent safety regulators

etc, it could teach engineers a great deal about real world engineering, which is a different subject from how to get the right answers to coursework problems.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K