(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

9.8a) Show that a classical oscillating eletric dipolepwith fields given by (9.18) radiates electromagnetic angular momentum to infinity at the rate

[tex]

\frac{d\mathbf{L}}{dt}=\frac{k^3}{12\pi\epsilon_0}\textrm{Im}[\mathbf{p^*\times p}]

[/tex]

Hint: The electromagnetic angular momentum density comes from more than the transverse (radiation zone) components of the field.

2. Relevant equations

Dipole fields (9.18):

[tex]

\mathbf{H}=\frac{ck^2}{4\pi}(\mathbf{n\times p}) \frac{e^{ikr}}{r}(1-\frac{1}{ikr})

[/tex]

[tex]

\mathbf{E}=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}(k^2\mathbf{(n\times p)\times n} \frac{e^{ikr}}{r}+(3\mathbf{n(n\cdot p)-p})(\frac{1}{r^3}-\frac{ik}{r^2})e^{ikr})

[/tex]

(n is the unit vector in direction x)

Electromagnetic momentum density (6.118)

[tex]

\mathbf{g}=\frac{1}{c^2}(\mathbf{E\times H})

[/tex]

3. The attempt at a solution

So I guess the angular momentum density is

[tex]

\mathbf{x\times g}

[/tex]

which with the fields in (9.18) simplifies to

[tex]

\frac{ik^2}{8\pi^2 \epsilon_0}\mathbf{(n\cdot p)(n \times p^*)}(\frac{k}{r^2}+\frac{1}{ikr^4})

[/tex]

if I use the complex Poynting vector

[tex]

\mathbf{E\times H^*}.

[/tex]

From here I'm not sure how to continue. This is the angular momentum density (per volume). If I integrate it over the whole space I get the total angular momentum, not only the part radiated to infinity. Since it is per volume I will not get the right dimension if I do as for the power radiated to infinity (integrate the Poynting vector over a spherical surface, radius R, and let R->infinity). What integration should I do?

I tried to integrate only the part prop. 1/r^2 (since I guess the other part will not "reach infinity") over a sphere with radius R and got

[tex]

\mathbf{L}=\frac{ik^3}{6 c \pi \epsilon_0}(\mathbf{p^*\times p})R

[/tex]

This looks similar to the answer, but will diverge in the limit R->inf. I also don't see how to take the time derivative of this. If I use the complex Poynting vector (which I guess I should?) the complex exponentials containing the (harmonic) time dependence will cancel.

Any hint would be appreciated!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# Jackson Electrodynamics problem 9.8a

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

Have something to add?

- Similar discussions for: Jackson Electrodynamics problem 9.8a

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**