Undergrad Calculating Jacobian Determinant

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the Jacobian determinant in relation to fluid dynamics, specifically referencing a paper's notation. It clarifies that the relationship between the positions of fluid elements at different times can be expressed as x_i = f(X_i), with the Jacobian matrix derived from the partial derivatives of these functions. The correct formulation emphasizes that equations should avoid using more than two equal indices to prevent confusion, and the Jacobian is defined as the determinant of the matrix of partial derivatives. Additionally, there is a caution against posting copyrighted material in attachments. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately applying the Jacobian in fluid dynamics.
Apashanka
Messages
427
Reaction score
15
I came across a line in this paper at page (2) at right side 2nd para where it is written ##d^3x=Jd^3X## where ##J## is the Jacobian and x and X are the positions of the fluid elements at time ##t_0## and ##t## respectively.
Here what I have concluded that ##x_i=f(X_i)## where the functional dependence of ##X_i##(e.g ##f(X_i)##) varies with the time evolution of ##x## for the ##i^{th}## coordinate and call this ##f_i## and now using this ##dx_i=\frac{\partial f_i}{\partial X_i}dX_i## and similarly for the ##i^{th},j^{th}## and ##k^{th}##.
The matrix containing the terms ##\frac{\partial f_i}{\partial x_i}## at the diagonal is the Jacobian matrix and it's determinant times ##d^3X## gives ##d^3x##
Isn't it??
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
It's the Jacobian. Your notation is very dangerous. There must never ever be equations with more than two equal indices. If there are two equal indices you have to sum over them, i.e.,
$$\mathrm{d} x_i = \frac{\partial x_i}{\partial X_j} \mathrm{d} X_j=\sum_{j=1}^3\frac{\partial x_i}{\partial X_j} \mathrm{d} X_j ,$$
and the Jacobian is the full determinand of the Jacobian Matrix,
$$J=\mathrm{det} \frac{\partial x_i}{\partial X_j}.$$
By the way, you should not post copyrighted material as an attachement!
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
992
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
967
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K