Jacobian matrix determinant vanishes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of a vanishing determinant of a Jacobian matrix during coordinate transformations involving Euler angles. Specifically, the transformation is represented as a product of rotation matrices: \( R_{z}(\gamma) R_{x}(\beta) R_{z}(\alpha) \). The participants conclude that if the determinant of the Jacobian matrix vanishes, it indicates a potential error in the calculation, as the determinants of the individual rotation matrices \( R_x \), \( R_y \), and \( R_z \) are consistently 1.0, confirming that the overall determinant should also equal 1.0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Jacobian matrices in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with coordinate transformations and their properties
  • Knowledge of rotation matrices, particularly in three-dimensional space
  • Basic grasp of Euler angles and their application in rotations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Jacobian matrices in detail
  • Learn about the derivation and application of rotation matrices in 3D transformations
  • Explore the significance of determinants in linear transformations
  • Investigate common pitfalls in calculating determinants of composite transformations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers involved in robotics, computer graphics, or any field requiring an understanding of coordinate transformations and their mathematical implications.

Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
What exactly does it mean when the determinant of a Jacobian matrix vanishes? Does that imply that the coordinate transformation is not a good one?

How do you know if you coordinate transformation is a good one or a bad one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me explain further. This is the particular transformation I am looking at:

[itex]\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> x(t) \\<br /> y(t) \\<br /> z(t)<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)= R_{z}(\gamma) R_{x}(\beta) R_{z}(\alpha)\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_o \\<br /> y_o \\<br /> z_o<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/itex],

here, the vector [itex](x_{o},y_{o},z_{o})[/itex] is just the initial positions of small pieces of a solid cube, and the angles [itex]\alpha(t)[/itex],[itex]\beta(t)[/itex],[itex]\gamma(t)[/itex] are the Euler angles (all functions of time).

When I expand this out, and form the Jacobian matrix, it's determinant vanishes.
 
Probably there is a mistake in your calculation. In the standard forms, the determinant of Rx , Ry and Rz all are 1.0 , for any angles. So is the determinant of their product.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K