yungman
- 5,741
- 291
From more than one textbook, they only talking about change of variables from 2-space to 2-space or from 3-space to 3-spare. Eg:
\frac{\partial (x,y,z)}{\partial (u,v,w)} \hbox { for 3-space and }\frac{\partial (x,y)}{\partial (u,v)} \hbox{ for 2-space }
But for surface area of 3-space in the following example where the vector value function:
\vec {r} = u\hat{x} + u cos(v) \hat{y} + u sin(v) \hat{z}
You can see this is like:
\frac{\partial (x,y,z)}{\partial (u,v)}
Which I don’t see this from the book. My question is whether the Jacobian is still:
| \frac{\pratial \vec{r}}{\partial u} X \frac{\pratial \vec{r}}{\partial v}| ?
This is the standard way of finding surface area of a 3-space object. But this is like transform from 2 space (u,v)[/itex] to 3-space(x,y,z).
\frac{\partial (x,y,z)}{\partial (u,v,w)} \hbox { for 3-space and }\frac{\partial (x,y)}{\partial (u,v)} \hbox{ for 2-space }
But for surface area of 3-space in the following example where the vector value function:
\vec {r} = u\hat{x} + u cos(v) \hat{y} + u sin(v) \hat{z}
You can see this is like:
\frac{\partial (x,y,z)}{\partial (u,v)}
Which I don’t see this from the book. My question is whether the Jacobian is still:
| \frac{\pratial \vec{r}}{\partial u} X \frac{\pratial \vec{r}}{\partial v}| ?
This is the standard way of finding surface area of a 3-space object. But this is like transform from 2 space (u,v)[/itex] to 3-space(x,y,z).