Jefferson, D-La., office searched by F.B.I.

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the FBI's search of Rep. William Jefferson's congressional office as part of a bribery investigation. Participants explore themes of corruption among politicians, the implications of the search, and the broader context of congressional accountability and ethics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a belief that all politicians are corrupt, while others argue against this generalization, stating that not all representatives engage in bribery.
  • A participant questions the validity of claims regarding corruption, suggesting that without specific evidence, such statements are unfounded.
  • There is a discussion about the semantics of the term "representatives," with some participants clarifying that it includes both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of cutting congressional salaries, with some arguing it could lead to increased bribery, while others believe it would deter those motivated solely by money from entering politics.
  • Participants discuss the legality and appropriateness of the FBI's search of a congressional office, referencing the separation of powers and potential constitutional implications.
  • Some express skepticism about the likelihood of legal consequences for Jefferson, citing previous cases of ex-congressmen who received prison sentences.
  • There is a mention of a specific incident where a congressman was caught on tape accepting bribes, which some participants find particularly egregious.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the extent of corruption among politicians, with multiple competing views expressed. The legality of the FBI's actions and the implications of congressional salaries also remain contested topics.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the separation of powers and constitutional protections regarding searches, indicating a complex legal landscape surrounding the investigation.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12891430/

WASHINGTON - FBI agents searched the congressional office of Rep. William Jefferson late Saturday as part of an ongoing bribery investigation, NBC News has learned.

Jefferson, D-La., has denied involvement in any illegal activity.

The search, conducted by the Washington Field Office of the FBI, is extremely rare -- if not unprecedented, NBC reported.

This is all part of America's "Every representative must go" policy that seems to be going on lately. Yet something else our country doesn't need to be going through.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, they are all corrupt, so I think they should all go. Same for the senators (except possibly Specter).
 
They aren't ALL corrupt. Generalizations are bad.
 
If they have nothing to hide then what's the problem?

Right, pengwuino?
 
Exactly

10 characters
 
Pengwuino said:
They aren't ALL corrupt. Generalizations are bad.

Which one isn't accepting bribes?
 
Rach3 said:
Which one isn't accepting bribes?

Unless you can produce a list of 535 individual cases of bribery towards every single congressman, your statement is unfounded
 
Unless you can produce a list of 435 individual cases acquitting every single congressman of charges of bribery, your statement is unfounded.
 
dav2008 said:
Unless you can produce a list of 435 individual cases acquitting every single congressman of charges of bribery, your statement is unfounded.

Oh yah, the Senate isn't part of our government :confused:

Re-read what you just wrote and get back to me
 
  • #10
Well I thought this thread was about representatives as in the house of representatives.
 
  • #11
My appologizes, representatives as anyone who representes the people. I've always hated how representatives only means people in the House of Representatives. I always just mean all of those people when i say representatives... i think i should get into the habbit of just saying "Congressmen"
 
  • #12
Pengwunio: You are under the impression that there is a man or woman in congress who is not addicted to bribery? If so, name that person, and I will personally bribe them. As proof, I'll have the phrase "Penguins suck" appended to the next appropriations, in some obscure section, under that congressperson's name.
 
  • #13
Well you still run into problems there because many people consider a "Congressman" to be a member of the House of Representatives only.

But I guess we're just arguing semantics now:-p
 
  • #14
Yah, damn symantics (thats how i spell it because I've used computers too long :cry: :cry: )
 
  • #15
Rach3 said:
Pengwunio: You are under the impression that there is a man or woman in congress who is not addicted to bribery? If so, name that person, and I will personally bribe them. As proof, I'll have the phrase "Penguins suck" appended to the next appropriations, in some obscure section, under that congressperson's name.
Don't they get paid $186,000 year?
 
  • #16
scott1 said:
Don't they get paid $186,000 year?
$165,200 according to a quick google search.

What's your point?
 
  • #17
scott1 said:
Don't they get paid $186,000 year?
Yeah.. just so that their salaries can easily be written as $c ! :wink:
 
  • #18
Gokul43201 said:
Yeah.. just so that their salaries can easily be written as $c ! :wink:

:smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:

Well there's one reason why we shouldn't switch to the metric system!
 
Last edited:
  • #19
What the heck kind of units are those supposed to be?

c = 1.
 
  • #20
Now that's a good unit for them to use
 
  • #21
Yes it is.
 
  • #22
Gokul43201 said:
Yeah.. just so that their salaries can easily be written as $c ! :wink:
So they are breaking the laws of physics! We need a constional adment outlawing breaking of physics
No one can be paid $186,000/second without breaking the laws of physics
dav2008 said:
What's your point?
That they get paid WAY too much. They seem to get paid so much that there job is basically a bibery. Couldn't they do somthing better with the money like help hurricane katrine evacuee's, the Iraq war, national security etc.
 
Last edited:
  • #23
$165k isn't too much..

I mean you should be asking could they do something better with the millions of dollars they spend on campaigns every two years. (Or six years in the case of Senators since this thread is about both ;) )
 
  • #24
Cutting their salaries would only encourage them to accept bribes. Better to waste taxpayer money, then have them relying on lobbyists for sustainance.
 
  • #25
Caught on tape!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060521/ap_on_go_co/congressman_probe_7;_ylt=Av6F58y13vtn1A3zAa84Y5iGbToC;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
ALEXANDRIA, Va. - A congressman under investigation for bribery was caught on videotape accepting $100,000 in $100 bills from an FBI informant whose conversations with the lawmaker also were recorded, according to a court document released Sunday. Agents later found the cash hidden in his freezer.

Busted! :cool:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #26
I really hope he spends a few years in prison. Not that its likely.
 
  • #27
franznietzsche said:
I really hope he spends a few years in prison. Not that its likely.

Of course he will! There are plently of ex-congressmen in prison. Cunningham got an eight year sentence just this year.
 
  • #28
Rach3 said:
Cutting their salaries would only encourage them to accept bribes. Better to waste taxpayer money, then have them relying on lobbyists for sustainance.
No it would keep people who just want money out of poltics. My great grand father got paid minum wage when he was a poltican and he never expect birbes(but of cource after he got he became a (good) lobbyist)
 
  • #29
I've read on cnn.com where one of the house leaders ran to the white house and complained to bush about the FBI not playing nice. Is there some law or statute that says that the senate and house offices are off limits to investigations or something or is it just that they're all afraid that their sanctuaries are being threatened? Didn't the Supreme Court just rule that law enforcement can enter your home if they have a search warrant and wait a reasonable amount of time after knocking?
 
  • #30
Echo 6 Sierra said:
I've read on cnn.com where one of the house leaders ran to the white house and complained to bush about the FBI not playing nice. Is there some law or statute that says that the senate and house offices are off limits to investigations or something or is it just that they're all afraid that their sanctuaries are being threatened? Didn't the Supreme Court just rule that law enforcement can enter your home if they have a search warrant and wait a reasonable amount of time after knocking?


This is a special case. You have to remember that the Constitution establishes Congress and the Presidential Administration (including the FBI) as separate branches of government and regulates their relationship. It also says what it doesn't allow between the branches can't happen. So the normal law of the land concerning searches and seizures doesn't apply - the House is not a home!

I am sure the search will be defended unser the infinitely extendable exra-Constitutional presidential powers that Bush now claims.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K