Job growth in engineering management without PhD?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the career prospects in engineering management for individuals holding a Master's degree in electrical engineering, particularly in relation to the perceived advantages of having a PhD. Participants explore the implications of educational qualifications on job growth, the value of experience, and alternative career paths for those without a PhD.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that their experience in R&D revealed a workplace dominated by PhD holders, raising concerns about the impact of not having a PhD on career advancement.
  • Another participant argues that most engineering managers do not possess a PhD and suggests that lacking one will not hinder career prospects in the industry.
  • It is mentioned that the relationship between years of experience and educational qualifications can vary significantly by company, indicating that the value of an MS versus a PhD is not universally applicable.
  • One contributor warns against pursuing a PhD solely for career reasons, stating it may not be worth the investment.
  • Concerns are raised about the financial benefits of engineering management roles, with some suggesting that managers may earn less than their subordinates in certain high-tech environments.
  • A participant highlights the cultural differences in workplace attitudes towards titles and qualifications, noting that in their company, practical skills are prioritized over academic titles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of a PhD for career advancement in engineering management. While some believe it is a significant barrier, others contend that experience and value to the company are more critical factors. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall impact of educational qualifications on job growth.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the importance of a PhD versus an MS can be highly dependent on specific company cultures and practices, which may not be universally applicable across the industry.

iLIKEstuff
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
So I recently took a job in R&D right out of my Master's program (in electrical engineering). When I was interviewing at the company, I quickly realized that everyone was "Dr. so-and-so". I actually did not interview with a single person that did not have a PhD out of 8 people (except for the HR person).

Now I realize that someone with an MS can eventually become an engineering manager after many years of experience, but surely 3-4 years of experience with an MS will not offset a PhD, especially once this person has worked for 10+ years, i.e., MS + 14 years experience \neq PhD + 10 years experience, in terms of job growth.

So if my plan is to get into engineering management, because they make lots of money, should I have stayed for my PhD?

What are some other career paths for an MS with experience in R&D, which also make lots of money?

and how tough is it to get an engineering management position without a PhD?

Thanks for your thoughts.

A similar question was asked about a year ago, but was not followed up: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=391138
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My experience, with a couple of decades experience in the electrical engineering industry, is that most engineering managers do not have a PhD. I don't think the lack of a PhD will hurt you in industry, and in fact, getting into the work environment more quickly will definitely help your career. Don't worry about it - make yourself valuable to the company as quickly as you can and you will probably be rewarded.
 
iLIKEstuff said:
Now I realize that someone with an MS can eventually become an engineering manager after many years of experience, but surely 3-4 years of experience with an MS will not offset a PhD, especially once this person has worked for 10+ years, i.e., MS + 14 years experience \neq PhD + 10 years experience, in terms of job growth.

This is very, very company dependent.

So if my plan is to get into engineering management, because they make lots of money, should I have stayed for my PhD?

Don't ever get a Ph.D. for purely career reasons, it isn't worth it.

Engineering managers may or may not make lots of money. I've known some high tech companies in which the managers make less money than the people that they manage.
 
Apparently, you are in a company where people have a high regard for status symbols.

In the (large multinational) company I work for, titles like "Dr" are explicitly prohibited on all internal documents, name tags, office doors, etc. What matters is what you can do, not what bits of paper you have collected.

(Well, that's true except in the German offices, where people who have sat at adjacent desks for 20 years still call each other "Herr Dr. Ing. X" rather than "Hans" or "Klaus".)
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K