News John Bolton Lied to Congress: UN Ambassador Appointment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pattylou
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
John Bolton's recent testimony to Congress has come under scrutiny after he claimed not to have participated in any congressional inquiries in the past five years. Reports indicate he did testify in the Valerie Plame leak investigation, raising questions about the truthfulness of his statement. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack defended Bolton, asserting his written response was truthful, but Senator Joseph Biden suggested Bolton was involved in a State Department-CIA investigation related to pre-Iraq war intelligence claims.The discussion highlights concerns over Bolton's suitability for the UN ambassador role, with critics pointing to his controversial history and the potential for a recess appointment by President Bush, which some view as an abuse of power. The thread reflects broader frustrations with the administration's handling of appointments and perceived lack of accountability, particularly regarding the Iraq war and intelligence issues. Participants express skepticism about Bolton's integrity and the implications of his potential confirmation, emphasizing a pattern of behavior among Bush's nominees that they find troubling.
  • #61
edward said:
Ahmad Chalabi had a great influence on the Bush administration. Nearly everything he told them about Iraq was lies lies and more lies.
Leave it to the Bush administration to trust a man convicted of embezzling.

edward said:
The administration fell for his lies because he was telling them what they wanted to hear, such as "There are mobile bioweapons factories in Iraq", and much much more. The administration paid Chalabi over $33 million for his services.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalabi

The CIA could easily have picked his lies apart. Why didn't they?
Ever wonder why the head of the CIA got the medal of freedom for doing such a horrible job?

The lie that I found most telling was the one Condi Rice told when she insisted the anodized aluminum tubes were for enriching uranium. Not only were they the wrong size and shape, anodizing renders them useless to the enrichment process.

Anyone who takes the time to research and inform themselves on this subject would have a very difficult time not concluding that this war was sold to us the same way we are sold any other consumer product.

By the way, John Bolton was the main guy going around the CIA making sure that the analysts towed the line and "fixed the facts and intelligence" to fit the administrations policy. He was also on the Bush legal team opposing the democratic principle of counting votes in Florida 2000. Just the guy we need to promote truth and democracy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8786915/

"Bolton appointment sends message to the U.N.
White House looking to shake things up with hard-line appointee"
NBC News - Aug. 1, 2005
What will the political repercussions be of Bush’s recess appointment of Bolton?

Well, he is certainly going to alienate Democrats who don’t feel that Bolton has any credibility and who think he is an undiplomatic choice for a diplomatic post at the United Nations.
So here is a president who has already alienated the world and divided his country... Sounds like a good idea to me to "shake up things" in the international arena and to diss folks on the other side of the aisle again. :bugeye:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 238 ·
8
Replies
238
Views
28K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K