Jones Vectors and Polarization

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of linearly polarized light as it enters a medium, specifically focusing on the phase accumulation of right-handed circularly polarized (RHCP) and left-handed circularly polarized (LHCP) components. The problem involves determining the polarization of the wave as a function of distance traveled in the medium and identifying conditions for linear polarization in a different direction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to express the initial linearly polarized wave in terms of circular polarization components. There are attempts to derive coefficients for the circular polarization states and to rewrite the wave function accordingly. Questions arise about the correctness of these transformations and the implications for the resulting polarization.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the mathematical representation of the wave and discussing the implications of their calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the decomposition of components and the importance of energy conservation in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential misunderstandings regarding the relationship between the coefficients derived and the physical properties of the wave, particularly in relation to energy conservation and the requirements for achieving specific polarization states.

Yoni V
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Linearly polarized light in the x direction with wave number ##k_0## travels in the z direction. It enters a medium such that a RHCP component of the wave and a LHCP component each accumulate a phase of ##n_Rk_0z## and ##n_Lk_0z## respectively, where z is the distance traveled inside the medium.
a. What is the polarization of the wave as a function of z?
b. For which values of z do we get a linear polarization in the y direction?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


It's kind of a warm-up question and should be pretty easy, but I guess I'm missing something elementary...
I suppose I should write the wave in terms of ##\hat r## and ##\hat l##, apply the given transformation for each component, and then rewrite the answer in terms of ##\hat x, \hat y##. But I'm stuck on step 1, which is writing my initial x-polarized wave in terms of ## \hat r, \hat l##. Any advice, an analogous example or a more general treatment?

Thanks...

Edit: latex fixes...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yoni V said:
I suppose I should write the wave in terms of ##\hat{r} ## and ##\hat{l}##,
Yes that's right. Now it's a matter of finding the correct coefficients for ##\hat{r}## and ##\hat{l}##.
Do you know the Jones vectors for linearly and circularly polarized light?
 
Yes, the vectors are ##\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}(1,-i), \frac{1}{\sqrt 2}(1,i)## for circularly polarized light, and (a,b) for some linear polarization.
But I'm not sure how the initial linear input should be written.

I thought that if ## E_0 = E_{x0} \hat x ## then
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}E_{x0} (exp(in_Rk_0z)+exp(in_Lk_0z))\hat x+\frac{i}{\sqrt 2}E_{x0} (exp(in_Lk_0z)-exp(in_Rk_0z))\hat y$$
but that doesn't seem right, given the fact that I'm left with an imaginary y component, and then for the second part of the question, I need the x component to be 0. But then I get ##z= \frac{2\pi m -\pi}{k_0(n_L-n_R)}##, which leaves the y component with imaginary amplitude.
 
We want to write ##E_0 \hat{x} = E_0 \left( c_l \hat{l} + c_r \hat{r} \right)##. Using the property
$$
\begin{aligned}
&\hat{l}^\dagger \hat{r} = 0 \\
&\hat{l}^\dagger \hat{l} = 1 \\
&\hat{r}^\dagger \hat{r} = 1 \\
\end{aligned}
$$
, how can you determine ##c_l## and ##c_r##?
 
Ok, we can solve for them by
$$
\begin{pmatrix}1\\
0
\end{pmatrix}=\frac{c_{l}}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1\\
i
\end{pmatrix}+\frac{c_{r}}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1\\
-i
\end{pmatrix}\Rightarrow c_{l}=c_{r}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$$
and now
$$
\mathbf{E} = E_{0}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}e^{in_{R}k_{0}z}\hat{r}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}e^{in_{L}k_{0}z}\hat{l}\right)
= E_{0}\left(\frac{1}{2}e^{in_{R}k_{0}z}\left(\hat{x}-i\hat{y}\right)+\frac{1}{2}e^{in_{L}k_{0}z}\left(\hat{x}+i\hat{y}\right)\right)
= E_{0}\left(\frac{1}{2}\left(e^{in_{R}k_{0}z}+e^{in_{L}k_{0}z}\right)\hat{x}+\frac{i}{2}\left(e^{in_{L}k_{0}z}-e^{in_{R}k_{0}z}\right)\hat{y}\right)
$$
which is different from what I had before only by a factor of ##1/\sqrt{2}##. The problem with y-polarization remains, hinting that this is still incorrect...
 
Yoni V said:
The problem with y-polarization remains, hinting that this is still incorrect...
The question only asks you to generate y-polarized output regardless of whatever phase delay it may have accumulated.
 
Ok, got it, it indeed doesn't matter- we can decompose the expression for the y component and take the real part.
One last thing, I didn't understand your discussion of the dot products. Is there anything wrong with how I calculated the coefficients?
 
Yoni V said:
Ok, got it, it indeed doesn't matter- we can decompose the expression for the y component and take the real part.
One last thing, I didn't understand your discussion of the dot products. Is there anything wrong with how I calculated the coefficients?
I don't know how you calculated the coefficients which lead to how it looks like in post #3, but the form you derived there bears violation of energy conservation. You can check that the form in post #2 carries different energy from the incident one, which is ##E_0^2##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K