Joule's first law - kinetic energy of electrical current

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Joule's first law and the kinetic energy associated with electrical current, particularly in the context of resistive elements. Participants explore the relationship between drift velocity, kinetic energy, and the generation of heat in conductors, examining both theoretical models and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a current must have a quantum of kinetic energy entering and a lesser quantum exiting a conductor, questioning how to quantify this kinetic energy and its relationship to drift velocity.
  • Another participant points out that the kinetic energy is generally the same at both ends of the resistor, challenging the initial claim.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the usefulness of collisions in understanding circuits, while others seek to understand the process of Joule heating.
  • A participant introduces an analogy involving electron tubes to illustrate the behavior of electrons in a resistor, suggesting that the model helps conceptualize the process.
  • One participant argues that kinetic energy and drift velocity can be disregarded, emphasizing the role of the electric field and current density in generating thermal energy through Poynting’s theorem.
  • References to external resources, including articles and books, are provided to support various points and enhance understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the relationship between kinetic energy, drift velocity, and heat generation in resistors. Multiple competing views remain, with some participants questioning the relevance of kinetic energy and others defending its importance in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that many theoretical models are based on assumptions and simplifications, which may complicate the derivation of precise results. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on the underlying physics of Joule heating and the behavior of electrons in resistive materials.

Abimbola1987
Messages
83
Reaction score
13
Dear Sirs,

If I take this explanation as being true "The heat is generated on the microscale when the conduction electrons transfer energy to the conductor's atoms by way of collisions."

So a "current" must have a quantum of kinetic energy going into the conductor (resistive element) and a lesser quantum of kinetic energy coming out the other end.

So first, how do I quantify the kinetic energy of a electrical current? And where can I find the correct formulae that describes the relationship between drift velocity and the kinetic energy?

Thank you very much on beforehand.
Abim.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dear anorlunda

Thank you for the wiki articles, if I sum them up I get (no disrespect intended): "it's mostly based on assumptions and mathematical simplifications, thus making it very laborious to obtain a precise result"

Then I might as well assume that P α I2 R from a practical point of view.

But logically that bothers me because the current (which is proportional to the drift velocity) is the same on both sides of the conductor in electric theory. Unless the collisions are elastic, in which case it shouldn't generate heat.
 
Last edited:
Abimbola1987 said:
So a "current" must have a quantum of kinetic energy going into the conductor (resistive element) and a lesser quantum of kinetic energy coming out the other end.
This is not correct. The KE is generally the same at each end of the resistor.
 
Dale said:
This is not correct. The KE is generally the same at each end of the resistor.

So what you are saying is that the collisions are elastic?
 
Abimbola1987 said:
So what you are saying is that the collisions are elastic?
No, but I don’t think that the collisions are useful for gaining understanding about circuits.
 
Dale said:
No, but I don’t think that the collisions are useful for gaining understanding about circuits.

I can agree with you, however I'm trying to gain an understanding for the process of joule heating, and if the kinetic energy and drift velocity is the same at each end of the resistor, then where does the heat come from?
 
Abimbola1987 said:
If I take this explanation as being true "The heat is generated on the microscale when the conduction electrons transfer energy to the conductor's atoms by way of collisions."
An electron tube is a device where electrons are emitted from the cathode, then they accelerate until they hit the anode.

Now let's connect million electron tubes in series.

Well, that device that we just made is supposed to be a model of a resistor.

So when an electron goes through said device it accelerates, stops, accelerates stops ... more or less like an electron that goes through a resistor.
 
  • #10
Abimbola1987 said:
if the kinetic energy and drift velocity is the same at each end of the resistor, then where does the heat come from?
You can forget the KE and the drift velocity entirely. They are not necessary at all. You have an E field and a current density, so by Poynting’s theorem there is work being done. Since the resistor is not gaining mechanical or chemical or any other form of energy, all that is left is thermal energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Abimbola1987
  • #12
Dale said:
You can forget the KE and the drift velocity entirely. They are not necessary at all. You have an E field and a current density, so by Poynting’s theorem there is work being done. Since the resistor is not gaining mechanical or chemical or any other form of energy, all that is left is thermal energy.

Thank you for poynting to Poynting’s theorem (bad pun intended) - that was the thing I missed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
  • #13
jartsa said:
An electron tube is a device where electrons are emitted from the cathode, then they accelerate until they hit the anode.

Now let's connect million electron tubes in series.

Well, that device that we just made is supposed to be a model of a resistor.

So when an electron goes through said device it accelerates, stops, accelerates stops ... more or less like an electron that goes through a resistor.

Thank you for the analogy, it's pretty much what is described in the book suggested by "Lord Jestocost".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
715
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K