Journal selection advice for publishing my papers

[Mainframes]

How did you find PF?: Google

Hi all,

I completed my PhD close to 20 years ago and have since been in finance. I recently decided to try some research and authored 3 papers. I submitted the first paper to Nature Physics (a bit ambitious I know), and the editor replied saying that "they are unable to conclude that the paper in itself provides the sort of clear advance in scientific understanding that would be likely to excite the immediate interest of a diverse physics readership".

The editor suggested that I present the paper in a journal that publishes more specialised research. At the end of the reply the editor suggested I "consider Scientific Reports journal as a suitable venue for this work".

My questions are:

1) Is Scientific Reports a good journal? I've read some mixed reviews despite its high impact factor.
2) Would the editor only suggest Scientific Reports if they felt it a suitable place for my paper, or is it quite generic and polite for them to suggest another journal?

I don't have experience on the academic publishing side so appreciate the advice. Thank you in advance.

 

[PeroK]

 

[Mainframes]

Thank you

 

[berkeman]

Welcome to PF.

I submitted the first paper to Nature Physics

How many references did your paper list? What journals were those references from?

 

[Vanadium 50]

Scientific Reports is also an NPG journal. They are more likely to point you there than to a competitor, and in any event, it;s not really the job for an editor to find alternative papers for papers they reject.

As a journal, it was a bit of an experiment. The original idea was that it was to be open access, and without Nature's prohibition on confirming or negative results. It then shifted a bit towards a lighter reviewing process, and some lousy papers started getting through, The external board complained, so NPG decided they didn't need one, and so got rid of it. It's probably fair to say that this didn't really improve things.

 

[Mainframes]

Welcome to PF. How many references did your paper list? What journals were those references from?

Thank you for the reply. 32 references in total split across the below. I added 6 references recently following advice, and also formatted it into the APS following his advice to make it look more professional. I am not sure how much this helps, but I know presentation is important.

Online / not published	7​
Physical Review Letters	5​
Physical Review A	5​
Text book	4​
Reviews of Modern Physics	2​
Nature	2​
Nature Reviews Physics	1​
European Journal of Physics	1​
Nature Physics	1​
EPJ Quantum Technology	1​
Journal of Research of National Institute of Standards and Technology	1​
Applied Physics Reviews	1​
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical	1​

 

[Mainframes]

Scientific Reports is also an NPG journal. They are more likely to point you there than to a competitor, and in any event, it;s not really the job for an editor to find alternative papers for papers they reject.

As a journal, it was a bit of an experiment. The original idea was that it was to be open access, and without Nature's prohibition on confirming or negative results. It then shifted a bit towards a lighter reviewing process, and some lousy papers started getting through, The external board complained, so NPG decided they didn't need one, and so got rid of it. It's probably fair to say that this didn't really improve things.

Thank you for the feedback, so I understand you would have a slightly negative view of it. Of course, it is likely my work is not of much significance either in which case it is still a potentially a valid route, unless you are advising me to stay well clear of it?

 

[Vanadium 50]

I can't say "this paper best fits Journal X" without reading it, and I am not going to do that. I do enough of that as a referee.

The generic advice is "publish in a journal you read regularly".