I Just for fun: treadmill air conditioner efficiency calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the feasibility of using a treadmill's human-generated power to operate an air conditioning system for cooling. It highlights that while air conditioners are generally inefficient, a treadmill could theoretically generate enough power to provide significant cooling, estimating around 350 watts of output cooling from 100 watts of mechanical energy. However, the human body is only about 25% efficient, leading to substantial waste heat production. Economically, the concept is impractical due to high operational costs and maintenance concerns, despite the potential for energy generation. Overall, while the idea is intriguing, it faces significant efficiency and cost challenges.
DynV
Messages
35
Reaction score
4
What approximate portion of generated heat from being active on the treadmill, both the person on it as well as the machines themselves would be compensated/cooled if the treadmill resistances would be disabled/removed and instead 1/2 end cylinders would be connected to an air conditioner compressor? I'd like both machines used in this playful consideration to be the best (or amongst the top) average priced widely available one (so not a bad machine nor a difficult to obtain good one).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the most obvious and very short answer is that air conditioners are very inefficient converters. They take a LOT of power and mechanism to cool just a small amount.

Witness the fact that there is no such thing as a "Micro Air Conditioner". The smallest AC I've ever seen is about a cubic foot in size and weighs about 40 pounds. I guess those little beer coolers are smaller and lighter, but they're really bad at cooling things down; they're better at keeping previously cool things cool.

But one wonders why no one has ever thought to attach a human-powered fan to a treadmill...
 
DaveC426913 said:
But one wonders why no one has ever thought to attach a human-powered fan to a treadmill...
A rowing machine that I used to use at a previous workplace's gym had a built-in fan on it for a load, pointed at the rower. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
DaveC426913 said:
I think the most obvious and very short answer is that air conditioners are very inefficient converters. They take a LOT of power and mechanism to cool just a small amount.
A decent air conditioner will run an EER of between 11 and 13. Call it 12. That is 12 BTU/hour cooling per watt of input power.

Human power output can vary. Peak mechanical power output in the 300 to 400 watt neighborhood is possible. But 100 watts is more accurate for sustained output. If we hook a 100% efficient generator to the treadmill, that means that we can get 1200 BTU / hour of cooling.

How many watts of cooling is that?
Google said:
1 btu per hour =
0.29307107 watts
So from our 100 watts of input power we are getting ##1200 \times 0.29307107 = 350## watts of output cooling. That is not a "very inefficient converter".

However, the human body is not a particularly efficient machine. A ball park figure is 25%. In order to generate those 100 watts of output mechanical energy, we burn 400 watts of food energy and produce at least 300 watts of waste heat to be dumped via the 350 watts of air conditioning.

That sounds pretty darned close to break even in terms of energy.

In terms of economics, it is a non-starter. At ten cents per kwh, you are buying yourself a penny per hour. $7.20 / month if you run the thing 24/7. Then you have to worry about condensate, cleaning, maintenance, freon leakage, initial expense and the fact that the resistance is not as smooth as something like magnetic eddy currents. And you still have to plug the thing in because goodness knows the customers will want their animated LED display and fancy programs.

The exercise bike in my home cost about $350 when I bought it. Google says $500 or so today. It dumps energy with magnetic eddy currents and has a little one or two amp power supply to run the LED display and manipulate the magnets.
 
Last edited:
jbriggs444 said:
A decent air conditioner will run an EER of between 11 and 13. Call it 12. That is 12 BTU/hour cooling per watt of input power.
I was thinking the same. FYI, that's a good average of older units and window units but today the minimum allowed by federal law for residential split systems is 13 SEER (EER averaged over a season), and new high efficiency ones can up to around 20.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes cjl and jbriggs444
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...

Similar threads

Back
Top