Just understanding capacitors and e-fields

  • Thread starter Thread starter buddingscientist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the electric field (E) between two parallel capacitor plates, specifically questioning the use of the plate length (L) in the formula E = q/(ε₀L). Participants clarify that the electric field's units should be Newtons per Coulomb (or Volts per meter), not Newton-metres per Coulomb. The conversation also highlights the distinction between charge (q) and charge per unit length (λ), suggesting that the formula may assume a one-dimensional model of the plates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and their calculations
  • Familiarity with capacitor theory and formulas
  • Knowledge of charge units (Coulombs) and their applications
  • Basic grasp of electrostatics and Gauss's law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric field equations for parallel plates
  • Learn about the relationship between charge density (σ) and area (A) in capacitors
  • Explore the concept of charge per unit length (λ) and its implications
  • Investigate the application of Gauss's law in calculating electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of capacitors and electric fields.

buddingscientist
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
It's a problem were we are given the usual - 2 plates separated in air, distance D apart, each of length L, one excess +ve charge the other exces -ve charge

The question then states:
the magnitude between the e-field plates is: E = q/EoL, calculate the potential (blah blah..)

My question is why have they used L?
Wouldn't this give the electric field units of: C / (C^2.N^-1.m^-2)*(m)
(apologies for no latex)
= Newton-metres per Coulomb?

when it should be Newtons per Coulomb (or Volts per metre)?

Is the question assuming 1D plates?
Just looking to get this cleared up, thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know why they used L either... However, you have not specified what q is. Is it a charge, thus units Coulomb? Could it be that q is a charge per length with units C/m ?

I think it's weird using the length of a capacitor plate though... It's the area that usually matters. Usually it's:
[tex]E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0 A}[/tex] so [itex]\sigma = \frac{Q}{A}[/itex].

Maybe in this case [tex]E = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0 L} = \frac{\lambda}{\epsilon_0}[/tex] where [itex]\lambda = \frac{q}{L}[/itex].
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K