K+ Decay: Is the Feynman Diagram I Drew Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter billbray
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Weak
billbray
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I've attached a feynman diagram i drew myself because i can't find a proper feyman diagram for this decay. I assume that since the decay K+->u+ + Vu is weak it goes via a W boson.

Is this diagram correct?

thanks
 

Attachments

  • KAON DECAY.JPG
    KAON DECAY.JPG
    9.9 KB · Views: 1,848
Physics news on Phys.org
The diagram is correct. IcedEcliptic is talking about another decay channel.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
The diagram is correct. IcedEcliptic is talking about another decay channel.

Sorry, my mistake.
 
thanks guys!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top