K-th Prime Proofs & Co-Prime Numbers

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vmx200
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Prime Proofs
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 5K views
vmx200
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am having a hard time making head way on two problems related to the k-th prime and one about co-primes that I would really appreciate some help and/or direction!

Prove that:
(let pk be the k-th prime)
Picture1-1.png


and

Picture3-2.png

Regarding co-primes... is there any way to find a set of four numbers that are coprime, but cannot be subsequently grouped into sets of three that are?

Again, thank you for your time and generosity in helping me out!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first problem, is the number on the right prime or composite? If it's composite, what can you say about its factors?
 
hamster143 said:
In the first problem, is the number on the right prime or composite? If it's composite, what can you say about its factors?

Oh, sorry!
Uhmn... pk is the k-th prime, so pk + 1 (the right most term) would be a composite, I believe?
 
I'm asking about the whole thing: 1 + the product of all primes up to pk.
 
vmx200 said:
Oh, sorry!
Uhmn... pk is the k-th prime, so pk + 1 (the right most term) would be a composite, I believe?
I believe you are misreading the expression.

To clarify: [itex]p_{k+1} \leq (p_1~p_2 \cdots p_k)+1[/itex]