MHB Kate's Chances of Winning a 5 Match Tennis Tournament

Bushy
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
The Probability of Kate winning a tennis match is 80%. If she enters a 5 match knockout tournament, find the chance of her:

a) winning the tournament:


Is simply 0.8^5 = 33%

b) winning the tournament given she wins her first three games:

Is the intersection of the two over the probability she wins the first three = 0.8^5 * 0.8^3 / 0.8^3 = the same as part a?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Bushy said:
The Probability of Kate winning a tennis match is 80%. If she enters a 5 match knockout tournament, find the chance of her:

a) winning the tournament:


Is simply 0.8^5 = 33%

Keep your answer exact please. $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( \frac{4}{5} \right) ^5 = \frac{1024}{3125} \end{align*}$.

b) winning the tournament given she wins her first three games:

Is the intersection of the two over the probability she wins the first three = 0.8^5 * 0.8^3 / 0.8^3 = the same as part a?

No, winning all five and winning the first three is equivalent to simply winning all five. So the intersection is simply what you found in part (a).
 
Prove It said:
No, winning all five and winning the first three is equivalent to simply winning all five. So the intersection is simply what you found in part (a).

Therefore 0.8^3 / 0.8^3 = 1 ?
 
Bushy said:
Therefore 0.8^3 / 0.8^3 = 1 ?

NO! The top is the probability of winning all FIVE!
 
Well that would give a neat answer, but aren't we saying the intersection of winning the first three and winning all five should be winning the 1st three?
 
Bushy said:
Well that would give a neat answer, but aren't we saying the intersection of winning the first three and winning all five should be winning the 1st three?

No, the only way it is possible to do both "winning all five games" and "winning the first three games" is to win all five games!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top