KE of off-center impacts in rotating and translating rigid bodies

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the principles of kinetic energy (KE) in off-center impacts involving rotating and translating rigid bodies, specifically ancient thrown weaponry. The participants emphasize the importance of the inertia tensor and the distinction between elastic and inelastic collisions. In completely inelastic collisions, linear KE is lost, while rotational KE is conserved through angular momentum. The conversation highlights the complexity of calculating the energy transfer during impacts, particularly when considering the distance from the center of mass (CM) and the resulting changes in linear and angular velocities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inertia tensor in rigid body dynamics
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy and its conservation in collisions
  • Familiarity with elastic vs. inelastic collisions
  • Basic principles of angular momentum conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the calculations for kinetic energy in off-center impacts
  • Learn about the inertia tensor and its application in rigid body motion
  • Explore the conservation of angular momentum in inelastic collisions
  • Investigate advanced topics in rotational dynamics and energy transfer
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students interested in mechanics, particularly those studying the dynamics of rotating bodies and impact analysis in sports or weaponry.

dpettig
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand basic principles of ancient thrown weaponry. Let's say we have something like a bar with a known inertia tensor that is thrown from one end such that it is both rotating and translating. If it strikes something along either side of its center of mass (an off-center impact), how can we understand the energy available in the impact? For example if it strikes with its long axis roughly perpendicular to the vector of translation (see sketch), on one side (the "advancing" side relative to the combined rotation and translation vectors) the kinetic energy in the impact will be much higher than on the "receding" side. But even here not all the KE available in the body will be transferred to the impacted object (which for the sake of simplicity can be inelastic). I hope it's as simple as including the distance (r) from CM somewhere in the equation? Please forgive the terrible sketch.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    21.3 KB · Views: 199
Physics news on Phys.org
dpettig said:
... (which for the sake of simplicity can be inelastic). ...
Working in the rest frame of the common center of mass: For completely inelastic collisions (objects stick together), there is no linear KE after the collision. The remaining rotational KE follows from the conserved angular momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: osilmag
My apologies, I forgot the difference between elastic and inelastic collisions. This would be of the latter form, but all I care about is the KE available in the impact, so the specifics of the collision can be simplified as much as possible.
 
A.T. said:
Working in the rest frame of the common center of mass: For completely inelastic collisions (objects stick together), there is no linear KE after the collision. The remaining rotational KE follows from the conserved angular momentum.
I think that this over-idealizes the situation.

[I've cast the problem as two men rather than a man and a weapon. It is easier to refer to body parts and is pleasantly symmetric]

In a completely inelastic collision of one man's hand on another man's hand, the hands will come to relative rest, but not necessarily the men. One can calculate the impulse that is required to deliver enough combined linear and angular velocity change on each man so that the two hands each come to relative rest. One can then calculate the resulting change in linear and rotational energy for each man.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: osilmag
The change in momentum from the impact would be split between linear and angular. You would have to find the final linear and angular velocity to get the appropriate amount of linear and rotational energy. Good luck finding that. 🤷‍♂️
 
Thanks osilmag. Right, this is challenging, hence why I've read everything including a book on off-center impacts and haven't found a simple solution. But I am not a physicist by training, so I am suspicious that I've already come across the solution and didn't recognize it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K