KE of off-center impacts in rotating and translating rigid bodies

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the kinetic energy available during off-center impacts of rotating and translating rigid bodies, particularly in the context of ancient thrown weaponry. Participants explore the principles governing energy transfer during such impacts, considering both linear and rotational kinetic energy in the scenario of inelastic collisions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to understand how to quantify the kinetic energy available in an off-center impact, noting that the energy transferred may vary depending on the side of impact relative to the direction of motion.
  • Another participant mentions that in completely inelastic collisions, linear kinetic energy is not conserved, and the remaining rotational kinetic energy can be determined from conserved angular momentum.
  • A participant acknowledges the distinction between elastic and inelastic collisions, emphasizing a focus on the kinetic energy available in the impact rather than the specifics of the collision type.
  • One participant critiques the oversimplification of the collision scenario, suggesting that the dynamics of the impact should consider the relative motion of the bodies involved.
  • Another participant notes that the change in momentum from the impact would need to be analyzed in terms of both linear and angular components to determine the resulting energies.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about having encountered a straightforward solution, indicating a lack of formal training in physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and approaches to the problem, with no consensus reached on a definitive method for calculating the kinetic energy in off-center impacts. Multiple competing views on the treatment of energy and momentum in inelastic collisions are present.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential oversimplifications in modeling the collision dynamics and the dependence on specific definitions of energy transfer in the context of rigid body impacts.

dpettig
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand basic principles of ancient thrown weaponry. Let's say we have something like a bar with a known inertia tensor that is thrown from one end such that it is both rotating and translating. If it strikes something along either side of its center of mass (an off-center impact), how can we understand the energy available in the impact? For example if it strikes with its long axis roughly perpendicular to the vector of translation (see sketch), on one side (the "advancing" side relative to the combined rotation and translation vectors) the kinetic energy in the impact will be much higher than on the "receding" side. But even here not all the KE available in the body will be transferred to the impacted object (which for the sake of simplicity can be inelastic). I hope it's as simple as including the distance (r) from CM somewhere in the equation? Please forgive the terrible sketch.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    21.3 KB · Views: 203
Physics news on Phys.org
dpettig said:
... (which for the sake of simplicity can be inelastic). ...
Working in the rest frame of the common center of mass: For completely inelastic collisions (objects stick together), there is no linear KE after the collision. The remaining rotational KE follows from the conserved angular momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: osilmag
My apologies, I forgot the difference between elastic and inelastic collisions. This would be of the latter form, but all I care about is the KE available in the impact, so the specifics of the collision can be simplified as much as possible.
 
A.T. said:
Working in the rest frame of the common center of mass: For completely inelastic collisions (objects stick together), there is no linear KE after the collision. The remaining rotational KE follows from the conserved angular momentum.
I think that this over-idealizes the situation.

[I've cast the problem as two men rather than a man and a weapon. It is easier to refer to body parts and is pleasantly symmetric]

In a completely inelastic collision of one man's hand on another man's hand, the hands will come to relative rest, but not necessarily the men. One can calculate the impulse that is required to deliver enough combined linear and angular velocity change on each man so that the two hands each come to relative rest. One can then calculate the resulting change in linear and rotational energy for each man.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: osilmag
The change in momentum from the impact would be split between linear and angular. You would have to find the final linear and angular velocity to get the appropriate amount of linear and rotational energy. Good luck finding that. 🤷‍♂️
 
Thanks osilmag. Right, this is challenging, hence why I've read everything including a book on off-center impacts and haven't found a simple solution. But I am not a physicist by training, so I am suspicious that I've already come across the solution and didn't recognize it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K