MHB Kendra N's question at Yahoo Answers regarding work done to empty a conical tank

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses a physics problem involving the calculation of work required to empty an inverted conical tank filled with water. The tank has a height of 10 meters and a base radius of 4 meters, with water filled to a height of 8 meters. The solution involves using integration to derive a formula for work, incorporating variables such as the density of water and gravitational acceleration. The work is calculated by integrating the force needed to move water slices to the top of the tank. The final formula yields a specific value for the work required, encouraging further discussion on similar calculus-based physics problems.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Applying integration to physics and engineering?

A tank has the shape of an inverted circular cone with height 10 m and base radius 4 m. It is filled with water to a height of 8 m. Find the work required to empty the tank by pumping all of the water to the top of the tank (the density of water is 1000 kg per cubic meter).

PLEASE HELP! I do not understand how it is explained in the textbook.

Here is a link to the question:

Applying integration to physics and engineering? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Kendra N,

I prefer to work problems like this in general terms, and derive a formula we may then plug our data into. Let's let the base radius of the conical tank be $r$, and the height be $h$.

Let's orient a vertical $y$-axis along the axis of symmetry of the tank, where the origin is at the bottom of the tank, and the initial depth of the fluid in the tank is $y_0$. We wish to find the amount of work $W$ is needed to pump all of the fluid to the top of the tank.

Now, if we imagine slicing the cone of water we wish to remove into disks, we may state, using work is force $F$ times distance $d$ for a constant force:

$$dW=Fd=mgd$$

The force exerted is equal to the weight of the slice, which is the product of the mass and the acceleration due to gravity.

The mass $m$ of the slice is the product of the mass density $\rho$ (in [math]\frac{\text{kg}}{\text{m}^3}[/math]) and the volume [math]V=\pi r_s^2\,dy[/math] of the slice, i.e.:

$m=\rho\pi r_s^2\,dy$

The radius of the slice can be found by similarity. Please refer to the following diagram:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/804._xfImport

$$\frac{r_s}{y}=\frac{r}{h}\,\therefore\,r_s=\frac{r}{h}y$$

The distance the slice must be vertically moved against gravity is:

$d=h-y$

Putting it all together, we have:

$$dW=\frac{gr^2\rho\pi}{h^2}\left(hy^2-y^3 \right)\,dy$$

Summing up all the work elements through integration, we obtain:

$$W=\frac{gr^2\rho\pi}{h^2}\int_0^{y_0} hy^2-y^3\,dy$$

Applying the anti-derivative form of the FTOC, there results:

$$W=\frac{gr^2\rho\pi}{12h^2}\left[4hy^3-3y^4 \right]_0^{y_0}=\frac{gr^2\rho y_0^3\pi}{12h^2}\left(4h-3y_0 \right)$$

We now have a formula into which we may plug the given and known data:

$$g=9.8\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2}$$

$$r=4\text{ m}$$

$$\rho=1000\,\frac{\text{kg}}{\text{m}^3}$$

$$h=10\text{ m}$$

$$y_0=8\text{ m}$$

and so we find:

$$W=\frac{\left(9.8\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2} \right)\left(4\text{ m} \right)^2\left(1000\,\frac{\text{kg}}{\text{m}^3} \right)\left(8\text{ m} \right)^3\pi}{12\left(10\text{ m} \right)^2}\left(4\left(10\text{ m} \right)-3\left(8\text{ m} \right) \right)=\frac{3211264\pi}{3}\,\text{J}$$

To Kendra N and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other calculus based physics problems in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f16/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 

Attachments

  • kendran.jpg
    kendran.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 122
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top