Keppler's 1st Law: Examining a Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter rg057
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    First law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the proof of Kepler's First Law, specifically the application of Newton's laws of motion and universal gravitation. A participant questions the presence of an extra vector 'r' in the equation, which is clarified as representing the direction of the gravitational force. The negative sign in the equation is explained as indicating the attractive nature of gravitational force. Additional requests for clearer explanations or links to more straightforward proofs are made, highlighting the complexity of the topic. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of the physics involved in Kepler's First Law.
rg057
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i am examining a proof of kepplers first law for my conics project and I am a bit rusty on the physics, it begins withe the following line


Homework Equations


To begin with, we will start off by applying Newton's law of motion and Newton's law of universal gravitation together to find that

m a = (-G m M/r^2) r

i think there is an extra r in this equation? if no where does it come from??

here is the link if it helps
http://members.kr.inter.net/joo/physics/curriculum/kepler/proof.html

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The r is in bold which indicates its a vector. So the force of gravity has a magnitude of (-G m M/r^2) along the unit vector r.
 
thanks, altho the more I am looking at this the more i don't understand it,
can anyone explain where the negative comes from?
 
or if anyone knows of a link to a clearer proof, that would be appreciated also
 
The negative is there because the force of gravity is attractive.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top