I've been reading Ray D'Inverno's book about general relativity, and when he derives the Kerr metric he uses a trick with a complex transformation. I can follow the derivation, but I have no clue why it works. Anyone care to explain?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The derivation is:

They start with schwarzchild in Eddington-finklestein coordinates and use a null basis:

[tex]g^{a b} = l^a n^b + n^a l^b - m^a \overline{m}^b - \overline{m}^a m^b[/tex]

where

[tex]l^a = \delta^a_1 [/tex]

[tex]n^a = -\delta^a_0 - \frac 1 2 [1-m(r^{-1}+\overline{r}^{-1})]\delta^a_1 [/tex]

[tex]m^a = \frac 1 {\sqrt{2} \overline{r}} (\delta^a_2 + \frac i {sin\theta} \delta^a_3) [/tex]

[tex]\delta^a_0 = \partial_v[/tex]

[tex]\delta^a_1 = \partial_r[/tex]

[tex]\delta^a_2 = \partial_{theta}[/tex]

[tex]\delta^a_3 = \partial_{phi}[/tex]

Then they transform

[tex] v' = v + i a cos\theta [/tex]

[tex] r' = r + i a cos\theta [/tex]

and end up with:

[tex]l^a = \delta^a_1 [/tex]

[tex]n^a = -\delta^a_0 - \frac 1 2 (1 - \frac {2 m r'} {r'^2 + a^2 cos^2 \theta})\delta^a_1 [/tex]

[tex]m^a = \frac 1 {\sqrt{2} (r'+i a cos \theta)} (-i a sin \theta (\delta^a_0 + \delta^a_1) + \delta^a_2 + \frac i {sin\theta} \delta^a_3) [/tex]

Then they use

[tex]g^{a b} = l^a n^b + n^a l^b - m^a \overline{m}^b - \overline{m}^a m^b[/tex]

to get the Kerr metric.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Kerr solution as complex transformation

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**