MHB Khegan McLane's Math Problem: Rectangle Inscribed Between Parabola & X-Axis

AI Thread Summary
The math problem involves finding the area of a rectangle inscribed between the x-axis and the parabola y=36-x^2. The area function is derived as A(x) = 72x - 2x^3, with the domain for x determined to be 0 ≤ x ≤ 6. A graph of A(x) indicates that the maximum area occurs at x = 2√3, approximately 3.46. Calculus is used to confirm this maximum by finding the critical points and analyzing the second derivative. The solution effectively demonstrates the relationship between the rectangle's dimensions and the area under the given parabola.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

CAN SOMEONE HELP ME WITH THIS MATH PROBLEM?


A rectangle is inscribed between the x-axis and the parabola y=36-x^3 with one side along the x- axis.

Part a.) Write the area of the rectangle as a function of x.

Part b) what values of x are in the domain of A

Part c) sketch a graph of A(x) over the domain.

Part d) Use your grapher to find the maximum area that such a rectangle can have.

any help would be nice.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Khegan McLane,

I assume you meant to give the parabola as $y=36-x^2$. Let's take a look at a rectangle so inscribed:

View attachment 1679

a.) The base of the rectangle is $2x$ and the height is $y=36-x^2$, hence the area $A$ of the rectangle is:

$$A(x)=2x\left(36-x^2 \right)=72x-2x^3$$

b.) In order for the height of the rectangle to be non-negative, we require:

$$-6\le x\le6$$

and in order for the base to be non-negative, we require:

$$0\le x$$

Thus, in order to satisfy both conditions, we require:

$$0\le x\le6$$

c.) Here is a plot of the area function on the relevant domain:

View attachment 1680

d.) Looking at the plot, it appears the maximum occurs when $x$ is a little more than 3.4. Using a bit of differential calculus, we can find the exact value.

Differentiating the area function with respect to $x$ and equating the result to zero, we obtain:

$$A'(x)=72-6x^2=6\left(12-x^2 \right)=0$$

The critical value in the domain is:

$$x=\sqrt{12}=2\sqrt{3}$$

The second derivative is:

$$A''(x)=-12x$$

Since our critical value is positive, the second derivative at that value is negative, demonstrating that this critical value is at a relative maximum. Thus, we conclude that the area of the rectangle is maximized for:

$$x=2\sqrt{3}\approx3.46410161514$$
 

Attachments

  • khegan.jpg
    khegan.jpg
    6.1 KB · Views: 124
  • khegan2.jpg
    khegan2.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 122
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top