Kilometers to Miles Numerology

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kuruman
  • Start date Start date
kuruman
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
15,994
Reaction score
9,187
Screenshot 2026-06-06 at 9.44.18 AM.webp
I recently had to convert 7,923 km to miles and used the web converter (see right). It turned out that 7,923 km = 4,923 mi ignoring the decimal change. The matching of the last three digits astonished me and I wondered if there is a systematic way to find additional conversion matches like this and if they exist. I tried a few things with little progress. What do the numbers experts say?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Miles to kilometres, coincidentally, has approximately a Fibonacci relationship. One mile is 1.609km, while the limiting factor for a Fibonacci sequence is ##\frac{1 + \sqrt 5}{2} \approx 1.618##.

1 mile is approximately 2 km
2 miles are approximately 3 km
3 miles are approximately 5km
5 miles are approximately 8 km
8 miles are approximately 13 km

etc.
 
PeroK said:
Miles to kilometres, coincidentally, has approximately a Fibonacci relationship. One mile is 1.609km, while the limiting factor for a Fibonacci sequence is ##\frac{1 + \sqrt 5}{2} \approx 1.618##.

1 mile is approximately 2 km
2 miles are approximately 3 km
3 miles are approximately 5km
5 miles are approximately 8 km
8 miles are approximately 13 km

etc.
It looks like I didn't make my question clear. Here is what I meant to ask:

Find integer values X ,Y, U, W and Z such that
XUWZ km = YUWZ mi (rounded four digit distances)
given the conversion factor 1 km = 0.621371 mi.

I stumbled into one possibility. Are there more 4-digit distances and, if so, how can they be found? My gut feeling is that there are not.

More generally, if the conversion factor is a number between zero and 1, is there a way to find
integer values X ,Y, U, W and Z such that
XUWZ units 1 = YUWZ units 2 (rounded four digit distances)?
 
I think you could work it out by defining your numbers as polynomial sums. Then your relationship becomes

$$\Sigma ( b_n * 10^n ) = constant * \Sigma( a_n * 10^n )$$

Next add the constraint that the first 3 a values are equal to the first 3 b values

The remaining work is left to the OP
 
jedishrfu said:
I think you could work it out by defining your numbers as polynomial sums. Then your relationship becomes

$$\Sigma ( b_n * 10^n ) = constant * \Sigma( a_n * 10^n )$$

Next add the constraint that the first 3 a values are equal to the first 3 b values

The remaining work is left to the OP
That's the first (brute force) approach I tried without much success. So I thought that there might be a clever shortcut known to experts. If there isn't, I'll try again. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K