Kinematic Equations: Find the time t when two objects meet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving kinematic equations to find the time when two objects, A and B, meet. The participants identify a mistake in the equations, noting that B is initially ahead of A and does not move towards it in the provided expression. They emphasize the importance of correctly representing the directions of motion in the equations, as B must move towards A for them to meet. The concept of drawing a diagram is suggested to clarify the motion of both objects. Ultimately, the dialogue highlights the need for accurate representation of initial positions and directions in kinematic equations.
StephanieSamperio
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Object A is at X=0m. Beginning at a time 0 s, A accelerates from rest at 2 m/s^2 in the positive x-direction. Object B is at X = 50 m at t = 0s and begins moving towards A from rest with an acceleration of magnitude 4m/s^2.

Part A) Where do A and B meet?
Part B) How fast is A moving when they meet?
Relevant Equations
Xf = xi + vi(t)+1/2(a)(t^2)
Vf = Vi+a(t)
Part A)
So, I set the two positions equations of A and B equal to each other since the position has to be the same.

A: 0 + 0 + 1/2(2)t^2 = 50 + 0 + 1/2(4)t^2 :B

I know I have to solve for time t, but there's no way to solve it with both sides having t^2 so I am not sure which variables I got wrong for the objects.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Stephanie, :welcome: !

If you draw a picture, you will quickly see that B does not move towards A in your expression. Can you explain why not ?
 
Your equation reads

T^2 = 50 + 2T^2. That equation is easily solved for T. But your equation has a signage error.
 
BvU said:
Hello Stephanie, :welcome: !

If you draw a picture, you will quickly see that B does not move towards A in your expression. Can you explain why not ?
Hi!

I think I could explain. B is already ahead by 50 m meaning it would have to be in constant acceleration while A catches up
 
PhanthomJay said:
Your equation reads

T^2 = 50 + 2T^2. That equation is easily solved for T. But your equation has a signage error.
If there's two t^2 wouldn't they cancel out instead of being solved for?
 
StephanieSamperio said:
Hi!

I think I could explain. B is already ahead by 50 m meaning it would have to be in constant acceleration while A catches up
No, then B still would move in the same direction as A and the given is that it does not. So there is something wrong with your expression. Draw a picture.

StephanieSamperio said:
If there's two t^2 wouldn't they cancel out instead of being solved for?
You would get that if accelerations of A and B would have the same value: A and B are 50 m apart and they stay 50 m apart. Again, because in your expression B does not move towards A
 
This is the picture I drew. Would object A need to have a velocity to be able to meet with Object B? I believe my mistake in my equations is with Object A
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8665.JPG
    IMG_8665.JPG
    71.3 KB · Views: 646
How come the arrow at B points in a different direction than the one at A :rolleyes: ?
(whilst they appear in the same way in your expression ...)
 
BvU said:
How come the arrow at B points in a different direction than the one at A :rolleyes: ?
(whilst they appear in the same way in your expression ...)
In the question, it says Object B is moving towards A from rest which is why I drew them in different directions
 
  • #10
StephanieSamperio said:
In the question, it says Object B is moving towards A from rest which is why I drew them in different directions
But the equation you wrote has them moving in the same direction.
 
  • #11
So, @StephanieSamperio : how do you get B to move towards A (i.e. towards x = 0 , i.e. make xB decrease instead of increase) in your equations ?
 
Back
Top