Kinematics - Acceleration equation confustion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of acceleration in kinematics, specifically the relationship between acceleration, velocity, and position. Participants are examining the derivation and manipulation of the acceleration equation, questioning the validity of certain transformations and interpretations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the transformation of the acceleration equation from a = dv/dt to a = (dv/dx)(dx/dt) and questioning the correctness of these manipulations. Some express confusion about the implications of these transformations and whether they maintain the definition of acceleration.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of the mathematical relationships involved, with participants providing insights into the chain rule and its application. Some participants clarify misunderstandings regarding cross multiplication and the manipulation of differential terms, while others express uncertainty about the derivation process.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available for discussion. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the definitions and relationships used are accurate and consistent with established principles of kinematics.

help1please
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Kinematics -- Acceleration equation confustion

I have been following a derivation and can't quite wrap my head round what is happening. I don't know if the person who wrote it has made a mistake somewhere or I am making the mistake.

I am informed that

[tex]a = \frac{dv}{dt}[/tex]

Fine. Then I am told

[tex]a= \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]

(which is odd, one moment it is dv/dt now it seems to be dv/dx)

and that I should convince myself that this is the acceleration through a cross multiplication... but I did it and I got

[tex]\frac{dvdt}{dx dx}[/tex]

This surely isn't acceleration, have I made a mistake somewhere? And if the person I am following is wrong, what is the correct way to state this...?

They further said that

[tex]\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]

is just velocity, so they end up with

[tex]a = v \frac{dv}{dx}[/tex]

Can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


help1please said:
... [tex]a= \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]

(which is odd, one moment it is dv/dt now it seems to be dv/dx) ...

No.

The acceleration a does NOT seem to be dv/dx.

It would seem that a is dv/dx if we have a = dv/dx and we do not have that because we have instead that

a = (dv/dx)(dx/dt).
 


Assume that the acceleration is function of the position x: a=a(x(t)), a composite function of t. You get the derivative with respect to t if you derive with respect to x first then derive x with respect to t.

da(x(t))/dt=(da/dx)*(dx/dt).

ehild
 


Hi help1please,
you just messed up your cross multiplication
dv/dx * dx/dt is not dvdt/dxdx but dvdx/dtdx as you can see, you could just as well simplify by the 'artificially' injected dx/dx (=1) and get back to a=dv/dt

Cheers...
 


Acceleration is (dv/dt) but by application of the chain rule this can be written as a = (dv/dx)(dx/dt) because we are effectively cancelling out the dx top and bottom.
(I say effectively because dx is really a differential operator)

In your last eqn, (dx/dt) = v so we get a = v (dv/dx)

This sort of chain rule application can be important if you want to find the velocity of a particle as a function of position, acceleration as function of velocity etc.., although this requires some extra mathematics.(Separable diff eqns)
 


You probably understand it by now but..

a = dv/dt

Multiply top and bottom by dx

= (dv/dt)(dx/dx)

rearrange

= (dv/dx)(dx/dt)
 


help1please said:
Fine. Then I am told

[tex]a= \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]

(which is odd, one moment it is dv/dt now it seems to be dv/dx)

That's simply some manipulation (multiplying numerator and denominator by same thing), scratch out dx from numerator and denominator, you get the same expression as before. :wink:
 


oli4 said:
Hi help1please,
you just messed up your cross multiplication
dv/dx * dx/dt is not dvdt/dxdx but dvdx/dtdx as you can see, you could just as well simplify by the 'artificially' injected dx/dx (=1) and get back to a=dv/dt

Cheers...

I didn't mess up anything, it was work I was following and noticed something was wrong, that's all. But thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K