Kinematics and proportionality.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between displacement, velocity, and acceleration in kinematics, specifically when velocity (v) is proportional to the square root of displacement (s). The participant correctly derives that acceleration (a) is constant at (1/2)k², indicating that it does not depend on displacement. Furthermore, they conclude that velocity varies linearly with time (t) as v(t) = (1/2)(k²)t, confirming that velocity and time are proportional when initial velocity is zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic kinematics concepts, including displacement, velocity, and acceleration.
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly differentiation and integration.
  • Knowledge of proportional relationships in physics.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions and solve equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of constant acceleration in kinematic equations.
  • Explore the concept of proportionality in physics, particularly in motion equations.
  • Learn about the relationship between velocity and displacement in different motion scenarios.
  • Investigate the use of calculus in deriving motion equations from fundamental principles.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics, as well as educators and tutors looking for clear explanations of motion relationships.

raphile
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hey, please take a look at this problem, it should be quite straight-forward but I want to know if I've reached the right conclusion.

Homework Statement



A particle moves in a straight line with displacement s from some fixed point on the line and velocity v.

If v is proportional to sqrt(s), find the behaviour of the acceleration with s; and if v=0 when t=0, find how v depends on time.

The Attempt at a Solution



I put v = k*sqrt(s) and used a = v*dv/ds = k*sqrt(s)*(1/2)k*s^(-1/2) = (1/2)k^2. So it seems that the s disappears, and therefore the acceleration is constant. Is it correct to say this?

For the second part, I put dv/dt=(1/2)k^2 (the acceleration found above) and solved to give v(t) = (1/2)(k^2)t + c, and c=0 because v=0 when t=0. Hence my conclusion is that v varies with t, i.e. v and t are proportional. Is this right? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
raphile said:
For the second part, I put dv/dt=(1/2)k^2 (the acceleration found above) and solved to give v(t) = (1/2)(k^2)t + c, and c=0 because v=0 when t=0. Hence my conclusion is that v varies with t, i.e. v and t are proportional. Is this right? Thanks.

If you let v=k\sqrt{s}, then the derivative with respect to s should be
= \frac{k}{2 \sqrt{s}}
 
Last edited:
But in the part of my post that you quoted, I'm not using s at all. I'm just taking the acceleration that I found in the 1st part, (1/2)k^2, and calling it dv/dt, and then solving that to give v in terms of t. Is it not right to say v and t are proportional?
 
raphile said:
I put v = k*sqrt(s) and used a = v*dv/ds = k*sqrt(s)*(1/2)k*s^(-1/2) = (1/2)k^2. So it seems that the s disappears, and therefore the acceleration is constant. Is it correct to say this?
Looks good to me.
For the second part, I put dv/dt=(1/2)k^2 (the acceleration found above) and solved to give v(t) = (1/2)(k^2)t + c, and c=0 because v=0 when t=0. Hence my conclusion is that v varies with t, i.e. v and t are proportional. Is this right? Thanks.
Again, looks good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
911
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K