Kinematics in two dimensions problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves kinematics in two dimensions, specifically analyzing the motion of a car that drives off a cliff and calculating its initial horizontal velocity based on the height of the cliff and the horizontal distance traveled before impact.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the separation of vertical and horizontal motion, questioning the validity of using final velocity in the horizontal direction. They explore the time of flight derived from vertical motion and its application to horizontal distance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the independence of horizontal and vertical motions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of time calculated from vertical motion to horizontal motion, and a participant has proposed a new calculation for initial velocity based on this understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of gravity acting only in the vertical direction and the assumption that horizontal motion is unaffected by vertical forces. There is a focus on ensuring that the equations used reflect the conditions of the problem accurately.

ian_durrant
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Kinematics in two dimensions problem

Homework Statement


Chapter 3, Problem 20


Incorrect.

A car drives horizontally off the edge of a cliff that is 48.1 m high. The police at the scene of the accident note that the point of impact is 195 m from the base of the cliff. How fast was the car traveling when it drove off the cliff?


Homework Equations



y=V(0)t+ (1/2)gt^2

y=(1/2)(V(0)+V)T- maybe?


The Attempt at a Solution




Ok I think I've figured out the first part of the equation, finding out the time it took for the car to fly off the cliff- here's how I did it.

y= V(0)t+ (1/2)gt^2
-48.1= (0)t +(1/2)(-9.8)t^2
t=3.13

Here's where I think I'm messing up somewhere:

x=195 (how far the car flew off the cliff)
t=3.13 (what i got from the previous answer)
V(0)= ? (what i need to solve for)
V= 0 ( the car doesn't have any more veloicty after it crashed into something)

however, when i plug this into my equation :

x=(1/2)(V(0)+V)t, it says i didn't get the right answer. here's my math just for a double check

195=(1/2)(V(0)+0)(3.13)
195=1.57V(0)
V(0)= 124.5

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ian_durrant said:
1. The problem statement, all variables and
V= 0 ( the car doesn't have any more veloicty after it crashed into something)


Remember you have to treat the Y and the X completely different in this case. What would of happened to the car if there was no gravitiy pulling down from the cliff? Would it ever have been stopped by the ground? Would its velocity ever changed (disregarding air resistance). Gravity is only working here in the Y direction.
 
I'm a little confused, wouldn't V=0 on the x-axis if the car had stopped/crashed, but on the Y-axis there still is the force of gravity. Or are you saying that my time i computed for the Y values won't work for my X values?
 
No, the time traveled is the same for both the X and the Y. What I'm trying to convey is the point that the car crashed due to a constant acceleration downward in the Y direction (gravity). The motion of the car in the X direction is completely independent and without gravity would have continued traveling never hitting the ground. This is why using the Vf=0 in the X equation isn't valid (That would imply a negative acceleration which in turn would imply an additional force at work, which there isn't in the X direction). So, you found the travel time from the equations for the Y direction. This time we know has to be the same for the X direction. Also we know the distance the car traveled in the X direction, 195m. Can you figure for Vi from here? (remember there is nothing accelerating the car in the X direction)
 
so it would be a logical assumption that g=0 in the x direction, correct?

so an equaiton would look something like this?

195=V(0)(3.13)+(1/2)(0)(3.13)^2
195=3.13V(0)
V(0)= 62.3 m/s?
 
Looks good to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K