Kinematics question projectiles with vector components (baseball player Q)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a baseball player hitting a ball at a 45° angle from a height of 1.3 m, with the ball needing to clear a 3 m wall located 130 m away. The original poster is attempting to determine the initial velocity of the ball based on these parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster assumes the vertical velocity of the ball is 0 m/s at the height of the wall, leading to calculations based on kinematic equations. Some participants question this assumption, suggesting that the ball's vertical speed would not be zero at that point.
  • Participants discuss the need to find time as a variable in the equations, with hints provided to express horizontal velocity in terms of other variables.
  • There is a focus on the relationship between horizontal and vertical components of the velocity, with references to using trigonometric functions and the Pythagorean theorem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and providing hints to guide the original poster. There is no explicit consensus on the assumptions being made, but productive dialogue is occurring regarding the setup of the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the unrealistic nature of the original poster's calculated velocity, indicating potential issues with the assumptions made about the ball's trajectory and height. The discussion highlights the need for more information or clarification on the problem setup.

chiuda
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Base ball player makes perfect contact with a ball striking it at 45° angle above the horizontal at a point 1.3 m above the ground. His ball just makes it clear of the 3m wall 130m from home plate. What was the velocity at with he struck the ball.


Homework Equations


is my final answer correct? i think my steps are good and that my assumptions are perfectly reasonable but i am getting a very unrealistic answer, please can somebody help me it would be very appreciated?! :)


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so i assumed that when the question states the ball just makes it over the wall that its vertical velocity is 0m/s then assuming that i plugged it into this kinematic equation
d=(v2)(t)- (1/2)(a)(t)^2 (note i am trying to find time just through the vertical components) i then subtracted the height of which the ball was hit with where v2 was 0m/s which is 3m giving me 1.7 m for vert displacement so i have d i have v2 and i have a with is -9.8m/s^2. after plugging this into the equation and solving for t i get 0.6s. i then move on to find the horizontal velocity since it is constant and i now have time so i plug it into v=d/t because i have d horizontal (130m) and t (0.6s) from this i get 217 m/s (v horizontal) i then automatically know vi= 217 m/s as well because it was projected at a 45° angle then i use pathagreans theorem and solve for Vi and end up with 307 m/s [45°].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chiuda said:
Ok so i assumed that when the question states the ball just makes it over the wall that its vertical velocity is 0m/s then assuming that i plugged it into this kinematic equation

I would think it means that at 130 m the ball was 3 m above the ground. It's vertical speed won't be zero until it hits the ground (and bounces a few times, but that can be ignored).
 
yes i understand that but when the ball reaches its maximum height it has a vertical velocity which I'm assuming that the 3 m above ground is its maximum height
 
3 m above ground is NOT the maximum height. That is only the height of the fence, the ball needs to be hit much higher if it is to clear the fence. And it should be obvious that the ball could not be traveling at over 1000km/h initially...

Hint: What you need to find out is the t, perhaps in a form involving another variable.
 
I know that it's unrealistic that's why I asked the question I know I need to find t but it's unknown and I don't have enough information to find it! Ahhhhhhhhhh!
 
Like I said... t will end up containing another variable. That's okay, because it will cancel out in the end. t = [itex]\frac{d}{v}[/itex]. What is your horizontal d and horizontal v?
 
i only have dh no vh or t my d horizontal is 130 m
 
Again... Stop trying to plug in numbers for now. What is your horizontal velocity in terms of variables only?
 
horiz velocity is d
 
  • #10
sorry horiz velocity is v
 
  • #11
horiz displacement is d
 
  • #12
chiuda said:
sorry horiz velocity is v

No... v is your velocity at 45°. What is your horizontal velocity, if the velocity at 45° is v?

Hint: Use the Pythagorean theorem.
 
  • #13
Ok horizon velocity is Vh
 
  • #14
... NO. If my hypotenuse is v, then my horizontal component of my v must equal vcos45. That's what you need to plug in.
 
  • #15
OK. I don't have the horizontal component of the initial velocity
 
  • #16
[itex]x=u_xt[/itex]
[itex]y=u_yt-\frac{1}{2}at^2[/itex]

[itex]u_x=uCos45°[/itex]
[itex]u_y=uSin45°[/itex]

At time t, the ball is 130 from base(x) and at height of 3m(y)
You have 2 equations,2 unknowns.
 
  • #17
OMG I JUST DID IT WITH A FRIEND THANK YOU SO MUCH! Sorry for the confusion, but that one was a doozy
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K