Kinetic and potential energy in circular and rotational motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the Lagrangian for a bead of mass m moving on a rotating circular hoop of radius r, with a uniform angular velocity ω. The correct Lagrangian is established as L = 0.5mr²(φ̇² + ω²sin²φ) - mgr(1 - cosφ). Participants debate the conservation of energy E, derived from the Lagrangian, and identify discrepancies in the computed energy expressions. The consensus is that the potential energy should be expressed as mgR(1 - cosθ) and that the negative sign in energy calculations arises from the subtraction of the Lagrangian.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy concepts
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lagrangians in non-inertial reference frames
  • Explore the concept of effective potential in rotational systems
  • Learn about conservation laws in Lagrangian mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of angular velocity on kinetic energy
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and Lagrangian dynamics, as well as anyone interested in the complexities of energy conservation in rotating systems.

tjackson3
Messages
140
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a bead of mass m that is confined to move on a circular hoop of radius r. The axis of symmetry of the hoop is horizontal, and the hoop is rotating about a vertical axis at a uniform rate \omega. Neglect friction and assume a constant gravitational acceleration of magnitude g. Let the angle \phi specify the position of the bead on the hoop, with \phi = 0 corresponding to the bead lying at the bottom of the hoop.

Derive the following Lagrangian:

L = T-V = \frac{1]{2}mr^2(\dot{\phi}^2 + \omega^2\sin^2\phi) + mgr\cos\phi

Since the Lagrangian doesn't depend explicitly on time, there is a conserved quantity for this system, E = \dot{\phi}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\phi}}. Compute E and show that it is constant. Is the constant the total energy of the system T+V?

Homework Equations



Most relevant equations are there

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought I computed the Lagrangian just fine. My logic was that there were two sources of kinetic energy: that of the bead moving in circular motion (mr^2\dot{\phi}^2/2) and that of the bead rotating. My thinking was that as the bead rotated, if it was at an angle \phi, then it was tracing a circle of radius \r\sin\phi, so its kinetic energy would be mr^2\omega^2\sin^2\phi/2.

I think the potential energy is purely gravitational. If h=0 corresponds to the height of the center of the hoop, then the potential energy is -mgr\cos\phi. This gives the correct Lagrangian.

However, it does not give the correct energy. When I compute E, it comes out to be 1/2 mr^2(\dot{\phi}^2 - \omega^2\sin^2\phi - mgr\sin\phi. That middle term has the wrong sign, but I can't figure out why. Moreover, this version of E is not conserved. The only conclusion I can reach is that somehow, what I took as rotational kinetic energy is actually potential energy, but that doesn't make sense. Any thoughts? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand how your Rωsinθ is negative since Rsinθ is just the radial length from the axis of rotation to a point on the hoop

Potential NRG should be mgR(1-cosθ) because it is at a max when cosθ = 0 and that is perependicular to the axis of rotation and this is when your tangential velocity is a max

The lagrangian should be

.5mR2((dθ/dt)2 + ω2sin2θ) -mgR(1-cosθ)

and i know this is correct since i did this problem for an assignment a month ago
 
My R\sin\omega is positive. If you mean in the E computation, it's because in computing E, you subtract the Lagrangian, hence the negative sign.

As for the potential energy, I like yours much better than what I have; however, the first part of the assignment required matching the form shown in the OP, which didn't come through for some reason:

L = T-V = \frac{1]{2}mr^2(\dot{\phi}^2 + \omega^2\sin^2\phi) + mgr\cos\phi
 
I'm also beginning to wonder if you would even expect that quantity E to be the total energy of the system, since I think there's also an effective potential in there somewhere
 
Its the pot that changes sign not E. what u were given is wrong. My prof gave us the textbook solution for the non inertial frame. And this question is an example in taylor.

Edit talking the derivative of anything will give u force not energy
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
765
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K