4-derivative kinetic term Lagrangian

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a Lagrangian of the form $$L=\phi\Box^2\phi$$ and the task of demonstrating that it generates negative energy density. Participants are examining the implications of this Lagrangian in the context of field theory and energy density calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the expression for energy density derived from the Lagrangian and questioning the validity of certain transformations involving the d'Alembertian operator. There is a focus on the implications of using higher-order derivatives in the Lagrangian.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's attempts to manipulate the Lagrangian and clarify the mathematical expressions involved. Some participants are questioning the correctness of specific steps and the assumptions made regarding the d'Alembertian operator.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted complexity due to the presence of higher-order derivatives in the Lagrangian, which may affect the validity of certain energy density expressions. Participants are navigating through these complexities while adhering to the constraints of the problem.

kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33

Homework Statement


Show that $$L=\phi\Box^2\phi$$ generates negative energy density.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The energy density is $$E=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\phi}}\dot{\phi}-L$$ Also the Lagrangian can be rewritten (using divergence theorem) as $$L=-\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu(\Box\phi)$$ So I would get $$E=-\partial_0\phi\partial_0(\Box\phi)+\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu(\Box\phi)$$ $$E=-\partial_x\phi\partial_x(\Box\phi)-\partial_y\phi\partial_y(\Box\phi)-\partial_z\phi\partial_z(\Box\phi)$$. Why is this negative necessarily? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kelly0303 said:
Also the Lagrangian can be rewritten (using divergence theorem) as
L=−∂μϕ∂μ(□ϕ)​
No, it cannot. You need to remove the d’Alembertian from this expression.
 
Orodruin said:
No, it cannot. You need to remove the d’Alembertian from this expression.
I am not sure what you mean. I used $$\int(\phi\Box^2\phi)=\int\partial_\mu(\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)-\int(\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)$$ What is wrong? What do you mean by getting rid of the d'Alembertian?
 
kelly0303 said:
I am not sure what you mean. I used $$\int(\phi\Box^2\phi)=\int\partial_\mu(\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)-\int(\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)$$ What is wrong? What do you mean by getting rid of the d'Alembertian?
This is simply not true. What you are looking for is
$$
\phi \Box \phi = \partial_\mu (\phi \partial^\mu \phi) - (\partial_\mu \phi)(\partial^\mu\phi)
$$
 
Ah, sorry. You have ##\Box^2##, not ##\Box##. In that case you cannot use the expression for the energy that you have given since your Lagrangian will contain derivatives of order higher than one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K