4-derivative kinetic term Lagrangian

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33

Homework Statement


Show that $$L=\phi\Box^2\phi$$ generates negative energy density.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The energy density is $$E=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\phi}}\dot{\phi}-L$$ Also the Lagrangian can be rewritten (using divergence theorem) as $$L=-\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu(\Box\phi)$$ So I would get $$E=-\partial_0\phi\partial_0(\Box\phi)+\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu(\Box\phi)$$ $$E=-\partial_x\phi\partial_x(\Box\phi)-\partial_y\phi\partial_y(\Box\phi)-\partial_z\phi\partial_z(\Box\phi)$$. Why is this negative necessarily? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Orodruin said:
No, it cannot. You need to remove the d’Alembertian from this expression.
I am not sure what you mean. I used $$\int(\phi\Box^2\phi)=\int\partial_\mu(\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)-\int(\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)$$ What is wrong? What do you mean by getting rid of the d'Alembertian?
 
kelly0303 said:
I am not sure what you mean. I used $$\int(\phi\Box^2\phi)=\int\partial_\mu(\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)-\int(\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)$$ What is wrong? What do you mean by getting rid of the d'Alembertian?
This is simply not true. What you are looking for is
$$
\phi \Box \phi = \partial_\mu (\phi \partial^\mu \phi) - (\partial_\mu \phi)(\partial^\mu\phi)
$$