Kinetic and Potential Energy Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a skier starting from the top of a frictionless sphere of ice and seeks to determine the angle from the vertical at which the skier leaves the sphere. The context is rooted in the principles of kinetic and potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of energy, questioning how kinetic and potential energy relate at different points during the skier's descent. Some explore the forces acting on the skier, including gravitational and centripetal forces, while others express confusion about the energy equations and their application.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and questioning each other's reasoning. There is a focus on clarifying the relationships between energy forms and the forces involved, but no consensus has been reached regarding the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express frustration over the complexity of the problem and the difficulty in connecting the concepts. There are indications of potential misunderstandings regarding the conservation of energy and the definitions of height in relation to the angle from the vertical.

student34
Messages
639
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement



A skier starts skiing from the very top of a frictionless sphere of ice with very little initial speed. At what angle from the the vertical will the skier leave the sphere of ice?

Homework Equations



This question was in the Kinetic and Potential Energy chapter, so I guess we are suppose to use the kinetic and potential energy equations K = (1/2)*m*v^2, U = m*g*y and E = K + U.

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't even attempt this because I don't know how to relate the two energies in a way that would give me the answer.

This question is so much more different than any other question in the chapter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apply conservation of energy. What is the KE at the top? What is the KE and PE on the surface at height h deeper then the top? How is the height related to the angle from the vertical?
What force keeps the skier on the circular track?


ehild
 

Attachments

  • skier1.JPG
    skier1.JPG
    5.3 KB · Views: 459
The skier will stop moving on the sphere once the centrifugal force is exactly canceled by the component of weight along the radius of the sphere.
 
ehild said:
Apply conservation of energy. What is the KE at the top? What is the KE and PE on the surface at height h deeper then the top? How is the height related to the angle from the vertical?
What force keeps the skier on the circular track?


ehild

F(gravity) = m*g*cosθ
F(centripetal) = (m*v^2)/r
(1/2)*m*v^2 = m*g*h, where h = r*cos and v = (2*r*g*cosθ)^(1/2)
But when I make Fg = Fc, I get 2*g*cosθ = g*cosθ which comes to 2 = 1.
 
student34 said:
F(gravity) = m*g*cosθ
F(centripetal) = (m*v^2)/r
(1/2)*m*v^2 = m*g*h, where h = r*cos and v = (2*r*g*cosθ)^(1/2)
But when I make Fg = Fc, I get 2*g*cosθ = g*cosθ which comes to 2 = 1.



You made a mistake in the equation for conservation of energy.

The energy at the top of the hill is equal to the energy at the point where the skier detaches from the hill.
What is the potential energy at the top? What is it at the point of detach?

ehild
 
ehild said:
You made a mistake in the equation for conservation of energy.

Hmmm, I can't find the mistake. Doesn't initial potential energy equal final kinetic energy?

The energy at the top of the hill is equal to the energy at the point where the skier detaches from the hill.
What is the potential energy at the top? What is it at the point of detach?

ehild

Oh boy, that seems to be my wall. I have to give up. I have spent way too much time on this question.
 
Can somebody please give me the answer. The answer will hopefully help me because I just can't make the connection myself.
 
student34 said:
Hmmm, I can't find the mistake. Doesn't initial potential energy equal final kinetic energy?

No. The initial KE+initial PE is equal to the final KE +final PE



ehild
 
ehild said:
No. The initial KE+initial PE is equal to the final KE +final PE



ehild

Am I on the right track by making F(normal) = F(gravity)?
 
  • #10
student34 said:
Am I on the right track by making F(normal) = F(gravity)?

By F(normal) if you mean the normal reaction and F(gravity) as mgcosθ, then yes. You have only committed a mistake on post #4 in the equation of the energy as ehlid has pointed out..
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Sunil Simha said:
By F(normal) if you mean the normal reaction and F(gravity) as mgcosθ, then yes. You have only committed a mistake on post #4 in the equation of the energy as ehlid has pointed out..

I should have been more specific because I do know that EP(initial) = EK(final). Knowing that and knowing all of the hints posted in this forum, I still don't even know where to start when trying to answer this question.
 
  • #12
student34 said:
I should have been more specific because I do know that EP(initial) = EK(final). Knowing that and knowing all of the hints posted in this forum, I still don't even know where to start when trying to answer this question.

You know it wrong.

ehild
 
  • #13
ehild said:
You know it wrong.

ehild

My book says K1 + U1(gravity) = K2 + U2(gravity) where 1 means initial and 2 means final. In this situation I have K1 = 0 and U2(gravity) = 0, so doesn't U1 = K2?
 
  • #14
You said that U=mgh, and h= Rcosθ. Is it zero at the final position?KE is equal to the potential difference between the initial and final positions.

ehild
 
  • #15
ehild said:
You said that U=mgh, and h= Rcosθ. Is it zero at the final position?KE is equal to the potential difference between the initial and final positions.

ehild

I see. But I still cannot see how this can give us the where the skier leaves the surface of the ice ball. I feel like I am close by choosing F(gravity) to equal F(reaction to Fc), but I just can't go further.

When I tried in Post #4, I ended up with 2 = 1.
 
  • #16
Go back to the basics. What was the initial potential energy? What will be the final potential energy?
What then, will be the potential energy difference?
 
  • #17
Sunil Simha said:
Go back to the basics. What was the initial potential energy? What will be the final potential energy?
What then, will be the potential energy difference?

I think y*m*g = y2*m*g + (1/2)*m*v2^2
 
  • #18
student34 said:
F(gravity) = m*g*cosθ
F(centripetal) = (m*v^2)/r
(1/2)*m*v^2 = m*g*h, where h = r*cos and v = (2*r*g*cosθ)^(1/2)
But when I make Fg = Fc, I get 2*g*cosθ = g*cosθ which comes to 2 = 1.
Your mistake is here: h = r*cosθ

What you're trying to do is ΔKE = mgΔh, but you must correctly express Δh in terms of r and θ. Then you'll be fine.
 
  • #19
Doc Al said:
Your mistake is here: h = r*cosθ

What you're trying to do is ΔKE = mgΔh, but you must correctly express Δh in terms of r and θ. Then you'll be fine.

Thanks, I get it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K