Kinetic energy along with conservation of momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a collision between a hockey player and a linesman, focusing on the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy. The scenario includes calculating the post-collision velocity of the hockey player and the percentage of kinetic energy lost during the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of momentum in both x and y components to find the final velocity of the hockey player after the collision. There are attempts to calculate the total kinetic energy before and after the collision and to determine the energy lost.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided detailed calculations and results for the velocity and energy lost, while others have noted the repetition of the thread topic. There is an acknowledgment of different approaches being attempted, particularly regarding the orientation of the vectors used in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

One participant references a previous thread on the same topic, indicating a potential lack of new information or resolution in the current discussion. There is mention of varying orientations in attempts to address previous misunderstandings.

Lolagoeslala
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a hockey player of mass 80 kg was skating at a velocity of 7.5 m/s [E 20 S] when he accidently hit a linesman who was just standing on the ice. The mass of the linesmass is 90 kg and his velocity after the collision was 3 m/s [E 30 N] find.
a) the velocity of the hockey player after the collision and
b) the kinetic energy lost during the collision as a percentage.

The Attempt at a Solution


given:
m1= 80 kg
m2 = 90 kg
v1 = 7.5 m/s [ E 20 S]
v1` = ?
v2= 0m/s
v2` = 3m/s [ E 30 N]

X component
m1v1 = m1v1` + m2m2`
(80kg)(7.047694656m/s[E]) = (80kg)(v1`) + (90kg)(2.598076211[E])
563.8155725 kgm/s [E] - 233.826859 kgm/s[E] = (80kg)(v1`)
329.9887135 [E] / 80kg = v1`
4.124858919 m/s [E] = v1`

y components
m1v1 = m1v1` + m2v2`
(80kg)(2.565151075m/s) = (80kg)(v1`) + (90kg)(1.5m/s[N])
205.212086kgm/s-135m/s[N] = (80kg)(v1`)
70.212086kgm/s/80kg = v1`
4.252651075m/s = v1`

4.124858919 m/s [E] + 4.252651075m/s = v1`
5.924 m/s [S 44° E] = v1`

b) Ektot = 1/2m1v1^2
Ektot= 1/2(80kg)(7.5m/s)^2
Ektot=2250 J

Ektot` = 1/2m1v1`^2 + 1/2m2v2`
Ektot` = 1/2(80kg)(5.924m/s)^2 + 1/2(90kg)(3m/s)^2
Ektot` =1403.75104 J + 405 kg J
Ektot` = 1808.75104 J

Ektot - Wdef = Ektot`
2250 J - Wdef = 1808.75104 J
Wdef = 441.24896 J

The Wdef is the energy lost during the collision

(441.248896 J / 2250 J) x 100%
19.6 %
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lolagoeslala said:

Homework Statement


a hockey player of mass 80 kg was skating at a velocity of 7.5 m/s [E 20 S] when he accidently hit a linesman who was just standing on the ice. The mass of the linesmass is 90 kg and his velocity after the collision was 3 m/s [E 30 N] find.
a) the velocity of the hockey player after the collision and
b) the kinetic energy lost during the collision as a percentage.

The Attempt at a Solution


given:
m1= 80 kg
m2 = 90 kg
v1 = 7.5 m/s [ E 20 S]
v1` = ?
v2= 0m/s
v2` = 3m/s [ E 30 N]

X component
m1v1 = m1v1` + m2m2`
(80kg)(7.047694656m/s[E]) = (80kg)(v1`) + (90kg)(2.598076211[E])
563.8155725 kgm/s [E] - 233.826859 kgm/s[E] = (80kg)(v1`)
329.9887135 [E] / 80kg = v1`
4.124858919 m/s [E] = v1`

y components
m1v1 = m1v1` + m2v2`
(80kg)(2.565151075m/s) = (80kg)(v1`) + (90kg)(1.5m/s[N])
205.212086kgm/s-135m/s[N] = (80kg)(v1`)
70.212086kgm/s/80kg = v1`
4.252651075m/s = v1`

4.124858919 m/s [E] + 4.252651075m/s = v1`
5.924 m/s [S 44° E] = v1`

b) Ektot = 1/2m1v1^2
Ektot= 1/2(80kg)(7.5m/s)^2
Ektot=2250 J

Ektot` = 1/2m1v1`^2 + 1/2m2v2`
Ektot` = 1/2(80kg)(5.924m/s)^2 + 1/2(90kg)(3m/s)^2
Ektot` =1403.75104 J + 405 kg J
Ektot` = 1808.75104 J

Ektot - Wdef = Ektot`
2250 J - Wdef = 1808.75104 J
Wdef = 441.24896 J

The Wdef is the energy lost during the collision

(441.248896 J / 2250 J) x 100%
19.6 %

This looks like a repeat of your earlier thread.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=651165&highlight=hockey+player

Perhaps just a new attempt at a solution on your part.
 
Please don't create multiple threads on the same topic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K