Undergrad Klein-Gordon: Schwarzschild Metric, Physically Acceptable?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the physical acceptability of solutions derived from the Klein-Gordon equation using the Schwarzschild metric. It confirms that these solutions can be physically realizable under specific conditions, particularly in the context of general relativity. The Klein-Gordon equation describes wave propagation for massive fields, and its validity hinges on conserving local momentum-energy. While it is possible for the system to interact with other fields, leading to momentum-energy exchange, the primary focus remains on gravitational effects. Overall, the use of the Schwarzschild metric effectively explains wave-like phenomena in a gravitational context.
Vitani1
Messages
51
Reaction score
9
Does this give solutions which are physically acceptable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes Vitani1 and vanhees71
Moderator's note: Moved thread to relativity forum.
 
A bit of context could help.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
If you use the Schwarzschild metric in the Klein-Gordon equation (see attached) and derive the equation for the particle as a function of its position in time and space, do you get physically realizable solutions? This is my question.
 

Attachments

  • download.png
    download.png
    3.5 KB · Views: 211
Understand that the Klein-Gordon equation encodes the propagation of waves for massive fields in the absence of non-gravitational interactions with the field. If you can physically realize those assumptions (and GR) and you can physically realize a massive (including special case m=0) field. Thus: "Yes."

Failure to satisfy K-G is failure to conserve local momentum-energy. That's not impossible, the system can be "bleeding" momentum-energy into or out of some other field via interaction but one must assume it may also not do so.
 
When you say absence of non-gravitational interactions within the field you mean to say that solving this for the Schwarzschild is effective in explaining wave-like phenomena in the presence of gravity exclusively?
 
I meant to include in the previous post the presence of gravity or the absence of a field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
932
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K