Know acceleration as a function of position, can I find velocity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between acceleration, velocity, and work in the context of a pendulum, specifically exploring whether velocity can be derived from acceleration as a function of angle through integration. Participants also examine the implications of dimensional analysis on these integrations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Marius questions whether velocity can be found by integrating acceleration with respect to angle, noting a conflict between intuition and dimensional analysis.
  • Another participant agrees that velocity can be found through integration but emphasizes the importance of including a constant of integration.
  • Marius presents a specific form of acceleration for the pendulum and attempts to derive expressions for angular velocity and angle through integration, raising concerns about dimensional consistency.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of integrating angular acceleration with respect to angle, with a participant arguing that the integration must consider the relationship between angular velocity and time.
  • A participant suggests using the chain rule to relate the derivatives and provides a reformulated equation for integration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of integrating acceleration with respect to angle, with some supporting the approach while others challenge its correctness. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the proper method for integration and the implications of dimensional analysis.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the assumptions made in the integration process, particularly concerning the relationship between angular acceleration, angular velocity, and angle. The dimensional analysis presented by participants is also not fully explored.

Jonsson
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hello I know acceleration of a pendulum as a function of angle. Can I find velocity by integration with respect to theta? My intuition says yes, but dimensional analysis tells me otherwise. What is right and wrong?

And what about work? Can I integrate tau = Ia with respect to theta and find work?

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Marius
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jonsson said:
Hello I know acceleration of a pendulum as a function of angle. Can I find velocity by integration with respect to theta?
Yes, to within a constant of integration.

My intuition says yes, but dimensional analysis tells me otherwise. What is right and wrong?
Show us your dimensional analysis and we'll be more able to help.

And what about work? Can I integrate tau = Ia with respect to theta and find work?
yes (assuming that ##\tau## is a torque and ##a## is the angular acceleration).
 
Last edited:
I have acceleration, ##\vec{\alpha}(\theta)## for the pendulum given by:

$$
\vec{\alpha}(\theta) = -\hat{k}\left( \frac{L\,m\,g}{I} \right) \sin\theta
$$If I could use integration to find ##\omega##:

$$
\vec{\omega}(\theta) = \hat{k}\left( \frac{L\,m\,g}{I} \right) \cos\theta + \vec{C}
$$

But If could integrate again:

$$
\vec{\theta}(\theta) = -\vec{\alpha} + \vec{C}\theta + \vec{D}
$$

Question 1: Surely that cannot make sense? ## \vec{\theta}## as a function of itself?

Question 2: And looking at units, ##\alpha## is angular acceleration, so it must have units ##\rm s^{-2}##, if I integrate twice, i basically multiply by ##\theta## twice, which is dimensionless so I get ##\vec{\theta}(\theta) : \rm s^{-2}##. #\vec{\theta}## should have no dimensions. So think I have a contradiction. What is correct?

What have I misunderstood?

Thank you for your time.

Kind regards,
Marius
 
Last edited:
Your first integration is wrong. [itex]\alpha[/itex] is [itex]d\omega/dt[/itex], not [itex]d\omega/d\theta[/itex] so you cannot integrate the right side with respect to [itex]\theta[/itex] as it stands. You can use the chain rule to write [itex]d\omega/dt= (d\omega/d\theta)(d\theta/dt)= \omega d\omega/d\theta[/itex]. So you can write your equation as
[tex]\omega d\omega/d\theta= -k\left(\frac{Lmg}{I}\right)sin(\theta)[/tex]
which, when you separate variables, becomes
[tex]\omega d\omega= -k\left(\frac{Lmg}{I}\right)sin(\theta)d\theta[/tex]

and integrate both sides.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K