-kx^2 = ? - Calculus relating to compound decay.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Barchie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Decay
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation dx/dt = -kx^2, which describes the rate of consumption of a compound x in a chemical reaction. Participants successfully derived the solution x = 1/k(t-c) and worked through finding the constants k and c given initial conditions. The final values determined were k = 0.5 and c = -2, satisfying the conditions that the initial concentration of x is 1.0 and that it is half consumed in 2 seconds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically separable equations.
  • Familiarity with calculus concepts such as integration and initial value problems.
  • Knowledge of chemical kinetics and the concept of reaction rates.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations to solve for unknowns.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in differential equations.
  • Learn about initial value problems and their applications in chemical kinetics.
  • Explore the concept of half-life in chemical reactions and its mathematical implications.
  • Investigate more complex differential equations in the context of reaction rates and dynamics.
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, mathematicians, and anyone involved in chemical engineering or reaction kinetics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those looking to deepen their understanding of differential equations in practical applications.

Barchie
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a chemica reaction the rate of consumption of a compound x is proportional to the square of the concentration of x. That is,

dx/dt = -kx^2

where k is a constant show that

x = 1/k(t-c)

The Attempt at a Solution



from my understanding usually i would try and find the primative of dt/dx, but I am having a problem seeing how it gets to the final stage of x = 1/k(t-c)

Any help greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you can't take the primitive just like that. Say you were asked for the primitive of dy/dx=x2, well then that is simple, but what if you were asked for the primitive of dy/dx=y2?
This is what you have here. You need the variable -kx2 to be in terms of t in order to take the primitive of dx/dt.

Remember this rule though: \frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{1}{dx/dy} so you can turn your problem into \frac{dt}{dx}=\frac{1}{-kx^2} and now you can take the primitive!
 
Awesome :-) Managed to get the answer. Unfortunately i am having an issue now with the second question, where i am asked to find k and C, given that the initial concentration of x is 1.0 and it is half consumed in 2 seconds.

Im a little bit lost here, so really detailed explanations would be helpfull.

I have found a reference to problems with rate of change given in the form of k(N-P) having a general solution of N = P + Ae^kt

So in my case i have x = k(T-C) So i need to find somehow the values of k and c, so if i were to convert to the general solution i would then have:

x = C + Ae^kt

Subbing in my values for time 0, concentration 1 i am getting:

1 = C + A

And now i don't know where to go :-( (Thanks for the help previously, much appreciated)
 
No no, in your case, x=1/(k(T-C)) :-p

Don't worry about any general formulae at this point. Read what the question gives you and see what you can make of it:

find k and C, given that the initial concentration of x is 1.0 and it is half consumed in 2 seconds.

The initial concentration is when the time is at zero. So when t=0, x=1. Substitute this into your formula.
What can you make of the second info given?
 
Ok :-)

With that,

1 = 1/k(0-c)

I get:

1 = 1/-kc

and, am unsure how to get one of the 2 variables i don't know. If i re-arrange i always have 2 unknowns stopping me from coming to an answer.
 
That's why you need to use the second info given in order to have two equations in 2 unknowns, which then you can solve simultaneously.
 
Ok i think I am onto what you are saying, are you able to let me know if I am on the right track.

2 Equations:

1: 1 = 1/k(0-c)
2: .5 = 1/k(2-c)

Rearrange the first one to equal:

1 = 1/-c
-c = 1
c = -1

Substitute c into eq#2 to give:

.5 = 1/k(2+1)
.5 = 1/(2k + k)
.5(2k+k) = 1
k+k/2 = 1
2k + k = 2
k(2+1) = 2
k = 2/(2+1)

k = 2/3 ?
c = -1 ?

Thanks for ur assistance thus far, hope I am on the right track!
 
Barchie said:
Ok i think I am onto what you are saying, are you able to let me know if I am on the right track.

2 Equations:

1: 1 = 1/k(0-c)
2: .5 = 1/k(2-c)

Rearrange the first one to equal:

1 = 1/-c

The equation was 1 = 1/k(0-c), so what happened to the k?

But you do have the right idea, you're nearly there.
 
My bad, think i got a little excited.

ok... My attempt again:

Equation#1: 1 = 1/k(0-c)
Equation#2: .5 = 1/k(2-c)

Rearrange Equation 1 to get:

c = 1/-k

Sub into Equation#2 to get:

0.5 = 1/k(2-c)
0.5 = 1/2k-kc
0.5 = 1/2k-k(1/-k)
0.5 = 1/2k+1
k = 1

Therefor c = 1/-1 = -1

So i figured i would test it, by popping the concentration at 2 seconds into a re-arranged formula to see if it would give me the time of 2 seconds:

Re-arranged formula:

T = (1/k+xc)/x

x = .5 c = -1 k =1

t= (1+.5*-1)/.5
t = 1

This isn't right :-( Any pointers :(
 
  • #10
Yep, recheck this
0.5 = 1/2k+1
k = 1
 
  • #11
aha...

.5 = 1/2k+1
0.5(2k+1) = 1
k+.5 = 1
k = 1-.5
k = 0.5

But if i sub this into the original formula

x = 1/k(t-c)
x = 1/.5(2--1)
x = 1/.5*3

unfortunately still not getting it :(

This still doesn't work
 
  • #12
So if K = to .5 instead of 1 then popping it back into

c= 1/-k
makes c = -2

if c = -2 k =.5

Then putting it back into the first equation to check still doesn't get me the right answer:

x = 1/k(t-c)
x = 1/.5(2--2)
x = 1/2

I must have missed something :-(
 
  • #13
Why have you missed something? You were already given that at time t=2 there was half consumed. This has been satisfied by the values of c and k that you found, and if you try to plug it into the other equation you should also satisfy the criteria of t=0, x=1. Your values are correct.
 
  • #14
ima douche.. been looking at this one for way too long now! thanks a heap for your help matey :)
 
  • #15
No worries :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K