MHB Λ and μ are scalars, find the value of λ and the value of μ

  • Thread starter Thread starter Help seeker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalars Value
Help seeker
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
ScreenShot_20210317094458.png
Figure shows a rectangle OABC in which OA = a and OC = c. F is the midpoint of CB and D is the point on AB such that AD : DB = 2:3
(a) Find
_ _ _ _ _ __ (i) CF in terms of a
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (ii) AD in terms of c

The lines OD and AF intersect at the point X Given that
OX = λOD and AX = μAF, where λ and μ are scalars,

(b) find the value of λ and the value of μ

Given that OX : XD = n:1

(c) find the value of n

Given also that I a l = 12 cm and l c I = 12.5 cm,

(d) find the area, in cm2, of quadrilateral XDBF .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
D
skeeter said:
part (a) is straightforward ... you should be able to use the given ratios to determine CF and AD in terms of a and c respectively.

part (b) ... let O be the origin, (0,0), of a Cartesian grid, A = (a,0), F = (a/2,c), etc.

OD has slope $\dfrac{|AD|}{a} \implies \text{ segment OD has equation } y = \dfrac{|AD|}{a} \cdot x$, where |AD| is in terms of c found in part (a)

AF has slope $-\dfrac{2c}{a} \implies \text{ segment AF has equation } y = -\dfrac{2c}{a} (x - a)$

using the two linear equations, determine the intersection, which will allow you to determine the values of $\lambda$ & $\mu$

part (c) should be easy to determine from the intersection information in working part (b)

part (d) ... area of XDBF = area of ABCO - CFAO - ADX
Don't leave it half-way
Plz complete it.
 
I would set up a coordinate system so that O is at the origin, A is at (a, 0), and C is at (0, c). Then B is at (a, c).
F is at (a/2, c) so the line from A to F is y= -(2c/a)(x- a)= -(2c/a)x+ 2c. D is the point on AB such that AD : DB = 2:3 so if we take D to be (a, x), AD= c- x and DB= x. That is, AD/DB=x/(c- x)= 2/3. 3x=2(c- x)= 2c- 2x. 5x= 2c so x= (2/5)c. D is at (a, (2/5)c). The line from O to D is y= ((2/5)c/a)x. X is the intersection of the two lines so y= -(2c/a)x+ 2c= ((2/5)c/a)x. 2c= ((2/5+ 2)(c/a)x= (12/5)(c/a)x. x= (5/12)(a/c)(2c)= (5/6)a.
y= (2/5)(c/a)(5/6)a= c/3.

X is the point ((5/6)a, c/3).https://mathhelpboards.com/account/

OX= sqrt((25/36)a^2+ c^2/9)= sqrt{25a^2/36+ 4c^2/36}= sqrt(25a^2+ 4c^2)/6.
OD= sqrt(a^2+ 4c^2/25)= sqrt(25a^2+4c^2)/5.

AX= sqrt(a^2/36+ c^2/9)= sqrt((a^2/36+ 4c^2/36)= sqrt(a^2+ 4c^2)/6.
AF= sqrt(a^2/4+ c^2)= sqrt(a^2+ 4a)/2.
 
Country Boy said:
I would set up a coordinate system so that O is at the origin, A is at (a, 0), and C is at (0, c). Then B is at (a, c).
F is at (a/2, c) so the line from A to F is y= -(2c/a)(x- a)= -(2c/a)x+ 2c. D is the point on AB such that AD : DB = 2:3 so if we take D to be (a, x), AD= c- x and DB= x. That is, AD/DB=x/(c- x)= 2/3. 3x=2(c- x)= 2c- 2x. 5x= 2c so x= (2/5)c. D is at (a, (2/5)c). The line from O to D is y= ((2/5)c/a)x. X is the intersection of the two lines so y= -(2c/a)x+ 2c= ((2/5)c/a)x. 2c= ((2/5+ 2)(c/a)x= (12/5)(c/a)x. x= (5/12)(a/c)(2c)= (5/6)a.
y= (2/5)(c/a)(5/6)a= c/3.

X is the point ((5/6)a, c/3).https://mathhelpboards.com/account/

OX= sqrt((25/36)a^2+ c^2/9)= sqrt{25a^2/36+ 4c^2/36}= sqrt(25a^2+ 4c^2)/6.
OD= sqrt(a^2+ 4c^2/25)= sqrt(25a^2+4c^2)/5.

AX= sqrt(a^2/36+ c^2/9)= sqrt((a^2/36+ 4c^2/36)= sqrt(a^2+ 4c^2)/6.
AF= sqrt(a^2/4+ c^2)= sqrt(a^2+ 4a)/2.
Tnx
 
Tnx
Solved
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top