L2 transformation reduces to the L1 transformation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pyrokenesis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    L2 Transformation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the L2 transformation simplifies to the L1 transformation when two reference frames are in standard configuration, specifically moving along the x-axis. The L2 transformations are defined with specific equations involving the Lorentz factor and velocity, while the L1 transformations are simpler and focus on the x-coordinate. The user confirms their understanding of the position vector as r = xi + yj + zk, which is appropriate for the standard configuration. Clarifications about the definitions of the transformations and the standard configuration help the user feel more confident in solving the problem. The conversation concludes with the user expressing gratitude and indicating they can now proceed with the solution.
Pyrokenesis
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I am having trouble answering the following question:

"Show that the L2 transformation reduces to the L1 transformation when the two reference frames are in standard configuration."

Am I wrong to assume that r = xi + yj + zk

Any help would be beautiful!

Thanx much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Show that the L2 transformation reduces to the L1 transformation when the two reference frames are in standard configuration."

I assume that the source of this question defines what the L2 and L1 transformations are, as well as what two reference frames are being compared. Please elaborate.
 
The L2 transformations are as follows:

r' = r + γv^[(1 - 1/γ)(r.v^) - βct];

ct' = γ(ct - r.β);

where β = v/c & v^ is the unit vector in the direction of v.

The L1 transformations are:

x' = γ(x - βct);
y' = y;
z' = z;

ct' = γ(ct - βx);

where β = v/c.

All are viewed in the S' frame.
 
We should also require that you define "standard configuration" but I'm going to assume that is with both reference frames moving in the direction of the x-axis :smile:.

Yes, you are correct to right r= xi+ yj+ zk. Notice that the difference is that "xi+ yj+ zk" assumes some particular coordinate system ("standard configuration") while "r" does not.

You may also assume ("standard configuration") that v= vi+ 0j+ 0k and that v^= i+ 0j+ 0k.
 
Sorry. Yes standard configuration is when both reference frames move in the direction of the x-axis.

Thanks I think I can solve it now.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top