Ladder Problem: Solving for the Minimum Angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Want to learn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Minimum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a ladder placed against a wall, where the goal is to determine the minimum angle to prevent slipping. The scenario includes parameters such as the ladder's weight, length, center of gravity, and the coefficient of friction at the base.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions of static equilibrium and the application of torque. The original poster attempts to set up equations based on forces and torques but expresses confusion about the moment arm and the resulting calculations. Others suggest reconsidering the moment arm and the point about which torque is calculated.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the correct approach to calculating torque and addressing the original poster's misunderstandings. There is an exploration of different interpretations regarding the setup of the problem and the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the constraints of static equilibrium and the specific conditions of the problem, including the absence of friction at the wall and the need to accurately account for all forces acting on the ladder.

Want to learn
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Ladder Problem :(

Homework Statement



A 80 kg ladder is 3.00 m in length is placed against the wall ant an unknown angle. The center of gravity of the ladder is 1.2 m from the base of the ladder. The coefficient of friction between the base and the ladder is 0.400. No friction between the wall and the ladder. What is the minimum angle the ladder makes so it would not slip and fall?

Homework Equations



2 conditions of equilibrium

Force equations

The Attempt at a Solution



This is what I tried. I figured that the normal force is [tex]N = mg[/tex] which equals in this problem then 784N.Then I find out the Force of friction [tex]F_f = \mu*N[/tex] in this case it's (0.400)*(784) = 313.6 Then I created this. Tclockwise = T counterclockwise

313.6 x 3sin(x) = 784 x 1.2cos(x)

I end up getting tan (1) = 0.017... which doesn't make any sense :(.

What am I doing wrong.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hello~ Maybe you want to sum up the torque created by gravity and friction? Since its static equilibrium so summation torque should be 0. Your forces are correct but the moment arm is wrong so the answer is wrong.
 


semc said:
Hello~ Maybe you want to sum up the torque created by gravity and friction? Since its static equilibrium so summation torque should be 0. Your forces are correct but the moment arm is wrong so the answer is wrong.


I'm guessing your are talking about this part 784 x 1.2cos(x) ??
How would I find the correct lever arm??

Could you elaborate on the adding up part also?

Sorry for asking such silly questions, but I just don't seem to understand.
 


Alright maybe you can google moment arm but the way i do it is shortest distance from direction of force applied to the torque.
Adding up? Just do like you normally do for translational equilibrium only this time its F.d

Nope no silly questions. Silly questions are questions you don't ask
 


Want to learn said:
This is what I tried. I figured that the normal force is [tex]N = mg[/tex] which equals in this problem then 784N.Then I find out the Force of friction [tex]F_f = \mu*N[/tex] in this case it's (0.400)*(784) = 313.6 Then I created this. Tclockwise = T counterclockwise

313.6 x 3sin(x) = 784 x 1.2cos(x)

Around which point are you taking the torque? After you define your point, make sure that ALL the forces not acting on that point are taken into consideration. Here, you didn't include the normal force, but the torque due to the normal force can't be 0 if the torque due to friction is non-zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
15K