Lagrange Pendulum Equation of Motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation and solution of the Lagrange pendulum equation of motion, specifically the equation θ'' = -g/r * sin(θ). The initial equation presented, r²θ'' = mg(cosθ - rsinθ), was identified as incorrect due to a misunderstanding of the variables involved. The conversation emphasizes that while the small amplitude assumption simplifies the problem, it is not necessary for solving the pendulum's motion, which can also be approached using elliptic integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with differential equations
  • Knowledge of small amplitude approximations in pendulum motion
  • Basic concepts of elliptic integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrange equation for pendulum motion
  • Learn about solving differential equations using elliptic integrals
  • Explore the implications of small amplitude approximations in mechanical systems
  • Investigate coupled equations and normal modes in multi-degree-of-freedom systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focusing on dynamics, mechanical systems, and advanced mechanics.

Andrew Deleonardis
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've derived the equation of motion for a regular single pendulum, but do not know how to solve the differential equation.
I have the following:
r2θ''2=mg(cosθ-rsinθ)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Before you worry too much about a solution, I suggest that you check your derivation. That equation does not appear to be correct. If you want to continue the discussion, please give us a diagram with proper labels.
 
unless r is dimensionless (probably not) your equation above cannot be correct. You are adding r sin theta to cosine theta for part of the term on the right. In general the right hand term (apparently) contains a mass, but the term on the left involves solely geometric quantities.

In addition, most of these type problems involve a small amplitude assumption. Is this the case here.
 
A small amplitude assumption is not essential. The large amplitude pendulum can be formulated just fine, although it is much more difficult to solve than with the small amplitude assumption.
 
Dr.D said:
Before you worry too much about a solution, I suggest that you check your derivation. That equation does not appear to be correct. If you want to continue the discussion, please give us a diagram with proper labels.

You're right, I completely messed up. My mistake was a mistake correcting a mistake. I had accidentally noticed that I wasn't supposed to take the derivative of the lagrangian with respect to the r because it was a constant, and mistakenly removed only half of it from my working out, thus the extra cos.

θ''=-g/r*sin(θ)
 

Attachments

  • Oops.png
    Oops.png
    29.6 KB · Views: 625
Yes, the small angle assumption is not necessary, and the problem is solvable using elliptic integrals. Solving the problem with the small angle assumption is commonly treated at the undergraduate level. Even at the graduate level, the small angle assumption is common, and the problems become more sophisticated because they treat many degrees of freedom (e.g. coupled equations and normal modes).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K