Lagrangian for a rod pivoting at the end of a clock hand

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eom
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation of motion (EOM) for a rod pivoting at the end of a clock hand, specifically addressing the harmonic oscillation of ##a(t)##. The initial EOM presented is ##ml^2\ddot \phi + mRl\varphi \dot \phi\sin(\phi - \varphi t) = 0##, which is later simplified using the small angle approximation. Participants emphasize the need to linearize the equation of motion around a stable point ##\phi^*##, suggesting a Taylor expansion to retain only linear terms. The corrected EOM is identified as ##l^2 \ddot a + Rl \gamma \dot \phi a = 0##, leading to the angular frequency formula ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{R \gamma \dot \phi}{l}}##. The conversation highlights the importance of precise notation and mathematical accuracy in deriving the correct results.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see belwo
Relevant Equations
##ml^2\ddot \phi + mRl\varphi \dot \phi\sin(\phi - \varphi t) = 0##
For (d),
1713422922316.png


I am confused how ##a(t)## oscillates harmonically. The EOM is ##ml^2\ddot \phi + mRl\varphi \dot \phi\sin(\phi - \varphi t) = 0##

Then using ##\phi - \varphi t = a(t)##
##l\ddot \phi + R\phi \varphi a(t) = 0##
Where I used the small angle approximation after substituting in ##a(t)##
Does anybody please know where to go from here to find ##\omega##?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simply linearise the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. You have attempted this but need to double check your math.

Also note: It is ##\gamma##, not ##\varphi##.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
Orodruin said:
Simply linearise the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. You have attempted this but need to double check your math.

Also note: It is ##\gamma##, not ##\varphi##.
Thank you for your reply @Orodruin!

##l^2\ddot \phi + Rl\phi \gamma a(t) = 0## is that please correct now?

Sorry I don't understand how you linearize the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. I have not been taught that. Could you please explain a bit more?

Thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @Orodruin!

##l^2\ddot \phi + Rl\phi \gamma a(t) = 0## is that please correct now?

No. Carefully consider the second term. Where did the ##\phi## come from?

ChiralSuperfields said:
Sorry I don't understand how you linearize the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. I have not been taught that. Could you please explain a bit more?
It is essentially what you are (attempting) to do. You write ##\phi = \phi^* + a(t)## and then assume that ##a(t)## is small. Perform a Taylor expansion in ##a(t)## and keep only linear terms.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
Also, for the first term, you have not inserted the assumption ##\phi = \phi^* + a## ...
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
I have solved the problem now.

EOM: ##l^2 \ddot a + Rl \gamma \dot \phi a = 0##

Angular frequency ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{R \gamma \dot \phi}{l}}##

Thanks!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
884
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K