Lagrangian for a rod pivoting at the end of a clock hand

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eom
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the equation of motion (EOM) for a rod pivoting at the end of a clock hand, specifically focusing on the oscillatory behavior of the angle ##\phi##. The EOM is established as ##ml^2\ddot \phi + mRl\gamma a(t) = 0##, where ##\gamma## is the correct variable to use instead of ##\varphi##. The linearization of the EOM around the equilibrium position ##\phi^*## leads to the angular frequency formula ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{R \gamma \dot \phi}{l}}##. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the small angle approximation and performing a Taylor expansion for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with angular motion and oscillations
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansion
  • Proficiency in solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrangian for oscillatory systems
  • Learn about the small angle approximation in physics
  • Explore the method of linearization in differential equations
  • Research the physical significance of angular frequency in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of oscillatory systems, particularly those involving rotational motion and Lagrangian mechanics.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see belwo
Relevant Equations
##ml^2\ddot \phi + mRl\varphi \dot \phi\sin(\phi - \varphi t) = 0##
For (d),
1713422922316.png


I am confused how ##a(t)## oscillates harmonically. The EOM is ##ml^2\ddot \phi + mRl\varphi \dot \phi\sin(\phi - \varphi t) = 0##

Then using ##\phi - \varphi t = a(t)##
##l\ddot \phi + R\phi \varphi a(t) = 0##
Where I used the small angle approximation after substituting in ##a(t)##
Does anybody please know where to go from here to find ##\omega##?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simply linearise the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. You have attempted this but need to double check your math.

Also note: It is ##\gamma##, not ##\varphi##.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Orodruin said:
Simply linearise the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. You have attempted this but need to double check your math.

Also note: It is ##\gamma##, not ##\varphi##.
Thank you for your reply @Orodruin!

##l^2\ddot \phi + Rl\phi \gamma a(t) = 0## is that please correct now?

Sorry I don't understand how you linearize the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. I have not been taught that. Could you please explain a bit more?

Thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @Orodruin!

##l^2\ddot \phi + Rl\phi \gamma a(t) = 0## is that please correct now?

No. Carefully consider the second term. Where did the ##\phi## come from?

ChiralSuperfields said:
Sorry I don't understand how you linearize the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. I have not been taught that. Could you please explain a bit more?
It is essentially what you are (attempting) to do. You write ##\phi = \phi^* + a(t)## and then assume that ##a(t)## is small. Perform a Taylor expansion in ##a(t)## and keep only linear terms.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Also, for the first term, you have not inserted the assumption ##\phi = \phi^* + a## ...
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
I have solved the problem now.

EOM: ##l^2 \ddot a + Rl \gamma \dot \phi a = 0##

Angular frequency ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{R \gamma \dot \phi}{l}}##

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
894
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K