Lagrangian for a rod pivoting at the end of a clock hand

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eom
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation of motion (EOM) for a rod pivoting at the end of a clock hand, specifically addressing the harmonic oscillation of ##a(t)##. The initial EOM presented is ##ml^2\ddot \phi + mRl\varphi \dot \phi\sin(\phi - \varphi t) = 0##, which is later simplified using the small angle approximation. Participants emphasize the need to linearize the equation of motion around a stable point ##\phi^*##, suggesting a Taylor expansion to retain only linear terms. The corrected EOM is identified as ##l^2 \ddot a + Rl \gamma \dot \phi a = 0##, leading to the angular frequency formula ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{R \gamma \dot \phi}{l}}##. The conversation highlights the importance of precise notation and mathematical accuracy in deriving the correct results.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see belwo
Relevant Equations
##ml^2\ddot \phi + mRl\varphi \dot \phi\sin(\phi - \varphi t) = 0##
For (d),
1713422922316.png


I am confused how ##a(t)## oscillates harmonically. The EOM is ##ml^2\ddot \phi + mRl\varphi \dot \phi\sin(\phi - \varphi t) = 0##

Then using ##\phi - \varphi t = a(t)##
##l\ddot \phi + R\phi \varphi a(t) = 0##
Where I used the small angle approximation after substituting in ##a(t)##
Does anybody please know where to go from here to find ##\omega##?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simply linearise the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. You have attempted this but need to double check your math.

Also note: It is ##\gamma##, not ##\varphi##.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
Orodruin said:
Simply linearise the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. You have attempted this but need to double check your math.

Also note: It is ##\gamma##, not ##\varphi##.
Thank you for your reply @Orodruin!

##l^2\ddot \phi + Rl\phi \gamma a(t) = 0## is that please correct now?

Sorry I don't understand how you linearize the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. I have not been taught that. Could you please explain a bit more?

Thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @Orodruin!

##l^2\ddot \phi + Rl\phi \gamma a(t) = 0## is that please correct now?

No. Carefully consider the second term. Where did the ##\phi## come from?

ChiralSuperfields said:
Sorry I don't understand how you linearize the equation of motion around ##\phi^*##. I have not been taught that. Could you please explain a bit more?
It is essentially what you are (attempting) to do. You write ##\phi = \phi^* + a(t)## and then assume that ##a(t)## is small. Perform a Taylor expansion in ##a(t)## and keep only linear terms.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
Also, for the first term, you have not inserted the assumption ##\phi = \phi^* + a## ...
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
I have solved the problem now.

EOM: ##l^2 \ddot a + Rl \gamma \dot \phi a = 0##

Angular frequency ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{R \gamma \dot \phi}{l}}##

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top