Lagrangian mechanics of a bead of mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the formulation of a Lagrangian mechanics problem involving a bead of mass constrained to move along a frictionless helical wire. The bead is influenced by a force dependent on its distance from a defined center, with the objective of expressing the problem using the distance along the helix as the generalized coordinate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the correct formulation of the Lagrangian, questioning the use of generalized coordinates and the implications of the force acting on the bead. There are discussions about the relationship between the distance along the helix and the cylindrical coordinates, as well as the nature of the force applied.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions about the setup. Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and relationships involved, while others suggest clarifications regarding the force and its dependence on distance.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a professor's assumption regarding the force being proportional to the distance from the center, which may influence the interpretation of the problem. Additionally, the nature of the generalized coordinate "s" and its relation to arc length is under consideration.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
consider a bead of mass m constrained to move on a fricitonless wire helix whose equations in cylindrical polar coords is
z = a phi where a is some constant
the bead is acted upon by a force which deends on the distance from the cneter only.
Formulate the problem using s the distance along the helix as your generalized coordinate.

for distance s along the helix [itex]s = a \phi_{0}[/itex]
but r would not be constnat
[tex]T = \frac{1}{2} m (\dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\phi_{0}}^2 + \dot{z}^2)[/tex]
z dot is zero and phi0 is a constnat soso
[tex]T = \frac{1}{2} m \dot{r}^2[/tex]


the force is dependent on the distance from the center only
thus [tex]\vec{F} = -k\vec{r} = -\nabla V[/tex](say)
then [tex]V = \frac{1}{2} k (r^2 + z^2) = \frac{1}{2} k (r^2 + z^2) = \frac{1}{2} k (r^2 + a^2 \phi_{0}^2)[/tex]
[tex]L = T - V = \frac{1}{2} m\dot{r}^2- \frac{1}{2} k (r^2 + a^2 \phi_{0}^2)[/tex]
is this formulation correct?
Or am i totally off?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First question...Why doesn't "s" denote the generalized coordinate in the lagrangian...?

L should be [itex]L\left(s,\dot{s}\right)[/itex]...

Daniel.
 
stunner5000pt said:
consider a bead of mass m constrained to move on a fricitonless wire helix whose equations in cylindrical polar coords is
z = a phi where a is some constant
the bead is acted upon by a force which deends on the distance from the cneter only.
Formulate the problem using s the distance along the helix as your generalized coordinate.

for distance s along the helix [itex]s = a \phi_{0}[/itex]
but r would not be constnat
[tex]T = \frac{1}{2} m (\dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\phi_{0}}^2 + \dot{z}^2)[/tex]
z dot is zero and phi0 is a constnat soso
[tex]T = \frac{1}{2} m \dot{r}^2[/tex]
the force is dependent on the distance from the center only
thus [tex]\vec{F} = -k\vec{r} = -\nabla V[/tex](say)
then [tex]V = \frac{1}{2} k (r^2 + z^2) = \frac{1}{2} k (r^2 + z^2) = \frac{1}{2} k (r^2 + a^2 \phi_{0}^2)[/tex]
[tex]L = T - V = \frac{1}{2} m\dot{r}^2- \frac{1}{2} k (r^2 + a^2 \phi_{0}^2)[/tex]
is this formulation correct?
Or am i totally off?
You are totally off.
1. For a helix in cylindrical coords, z and phi vary but r is constant.
2. I don't know what "a force which depends on the distance from the center only" means. Does "center" mean the axis of the helix or does it mean the origin of coordinates?
(I assume gravity is not acting.)
3. The statement "a force which depends on the distance from the center only" does not mean that F=-kr. It just means that F depends only the magnitude of the distance from whatever "center" means.
4. After you have written down the Lagrangian, eliminate phi and z in terms of s.
 
well our prof told us to assume that F = -kr maybe i shouldve stated taht anyway
s is the disatnce along the helix...
would this have something to do with arc length?
something along the lines of this
[tex]s = \int_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}} \sqrt{(\frac{\partial f}{\partial r})^2 + (\frac{\partial f}{\partial r})^2 + (\frac{\partial f}{\partial r})^2}[/tex]
where f is the function of the length of hte arc...?
 
Last edited:
If s is the length along the helix, it probably is
[tex]s=\phi\sqrt{a^2+z^2}=[/tex],
with [tex]z=sa/\sqrt{r^2+a^2}[\tex]<br /> and [tex]\phi=s/\sqrt{r^2+a^2}[\tex]<br /> The r in F=-kr must be the distance from one point on the axis.<br /> (Is it?)<br /> Otherwise the force could never do anything.[/tex][/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K