MHB Lagrangian Mechanics: Solving $\mathcal{L}(X,x,\dot{X},\dot{x})$ for 2 Masses

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Lagrangian for two equal masses connected by a spring, confined to the x-axis. The Lagrangian is expressed as $\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}_1^2 + \dot{x}_2^2) - \frac{1}{2}k(x_1 - x_2 - \ell)^2$. It emphasizes the transformation to new variables, where $X$ represents the center of mass position and $x$ denotes the spring extension. The equations $X = \frac{1}{2}(x_1 + x_2)$ and $x = x_1 - x_2 - \ell$ are derived to facilitate the analysis. Understanding these transformations is crucial for applying Lagrangian mechanics to the system.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Write down the Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}(x_1,x_2,\dot{x}_1,\dot{x}_2)$ for two particles of equal masses, $m_1 = m_2 = m$, confined to the $x$ axis and connected by a spring with potential energy $U = \frac{1}{2}kx^2$. [Here $x$ is the extension of the spring, $x = (x_1 - x_2 - \ell)$ where $\ell$ is the spring's unstretched length, and I assume that mass 1 remains to the right of mass 2 at all times.]

The Lagrangian, $\mathcal{L} = T - U$, is the kinetic minus the potential energy.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\mathcal{L} & = & T - U\\
& = & \frac{1}{2}m\left(\dot{x}_1^2 + \dot{x}_2^2\right) - \frac{1}{2}k(x_1 - x_2 - \ell)^2
\end{alignat*}

Rewrite $\mathcal{L}$ in terms of the new variables $X = \frac{1}{2}(x_1 + x_2)$ (the CM position) and $x$ (the extension), and write down the two Lagrange equations for $X$ and $x$.

The solution has:
Let $x = x_1 - x_2 - \ell$
Where did this piece come from (below). I see that adding them together produces $X$.
\begin{alignat}{3}
x_1 & = & X + \frac{x}{2} + \frac{\ell}{2}\\
x_2 & = & X - \frac{x}{2} - \frac{\ell}{2}
\end{alignat}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have two equations:
\begin{align*}
X&= \frac{1}{2}\,(x_{1}+x_{2})\\
x&= x_{1}-x_{2}-\ell.
\end{align*}
In order to see how $L$ is using these new variables, you must solve for the original variables $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$, and then plug those expressions into the $L$ that you know. So the two equations at the bottom of your post are simply using standard solving methods (elimination, substitution) to write the old variables in terms of the new.
 
Last edited:
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
635
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
4K